This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.


Hello. I am a new wikipedian,and I hope to start doing some editing soon, but if I'm doing anyhing wrong please tell me. So far all I've done is helped (a little) with some of the Britains Got Talent articles, because all the subjects I know stuff about have massive articles written about them (this may be because almost everything I know I learned from wikipedia). I might improve some articles on Decision Maths.

Articles I've started

edit

Kombat Breakers

Articles I've contributed to

edit

The Bar Wizards