User:Passer1ne2001/Cynarina lacrymalis/Marleec25 Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Passer1ne2001
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Passer1ne2001/Cynarina lacrymalis
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Cynarina lacrymalis
Evaluate the drafted changes
editThis draft is extremely descriptive and provides a lot of information many different traits about the coral, the level of detail is pretty impressive. One thing that I would suggest doing is separating the "Biology" section into two sections, something along the lines of "Diet" and "Reproduction." They both discuss different things and Biology is a very broad term for the two different topics that are described. It may also just be easier for people who are skimming to find information that is specifically related to reproduction or feeding. Other than that, honestly, I think I would try and model the descriptive section that this article has for my own article. And you did meet the requirement of adding in 3 new sources and a lot of grammatical work seems to be done on the article.