It is speculated that it is likely that the military can train its agents to send messages to centralized operations via a search engine entry on the Internet and receive a response in the form of a song, a set of songs, the lyrics of a song, or the first part of a song as it may be broadcasted using services like Pandora or other means possibly even radio stations that have an automated or computerized playlist and or disk jockey.
The military may also leverage this to harass and manipulate a targeted individuals who becomes aware of this form of communication by recognizing a myriad of uncanny and seemingly impossible confederacy of coincidences. After some time the targeted individual eventually becomes aware of the sheer impossibility of one coincidence after another after another that are in direct relation or reflection of their Internet behaviors and searching activities.
Since the events of September 11th there has been a growing community of people that consider themselves to be a targeted individual. Many of them make fanciful claims, or more fanciful claims than the speculation of this article. Examples include mind reading capabilities, voice to skull technology and remote electronic microwave torture. It is possible that a targeted individual may not realize that the military does not need to use mind reading technology, be it fictional or otherwise, if they are actively listening to you through your cellphone, computer even your OnStar system. If they are monitoring every website you visit, every search term you submit, every email you read and write, every destination you drive to, they may very well not need to be able to read your mind to have a pretty good idea of what you are thinking, or rather what is likely to be on your mind. If they are also monitoring those that are close to you they also know things about your life before you learn them, if ever. They can then apply this knowledge to the songs that they play for you.
If you were a secret agent they could use this music to give you for-warning about events that are likely "coming your way".
If you were a targeted individual they could use music to confound your sense of serendipity by overwhelming you with it.
All of this speculation has come from the imagination of one such, high functioning, intelligent, articulate, technically apt person who has had a plethora of uncanny or impossible string of coincidences lasting for as long as it took at increasing levels of intensity for the person to finally recognized the utter impossibility of these coincidences.
It is seemingly impossible to document and categorize all of these occurrences and whats worse is the person trying to document them, ends up in a state of mind where it becomes impossible to recognized the difference between a legitimate coincidence and a fabricated one. This works to erode the credibility of the targeted individual.
The single most common and difficult question for low profile people who believe that they are targeted individuals to answer is 'why you?' Why are you so special that you would attract their attention? The unfortunate, but often correct answer is arrived at by a health professional who has learned that delusional people often create a fiction for them selves that satisfies some deep psychological need to feel as if they are important or that their lives have not turned out to be so small. The answer that I give, as the original author of this article and one who feels as if I have been targeted comes from a TEDTalks presentation that I saw where scientists were mapping out and categorizing the complex social relationships and social functions that some people have in their small community. Some people are identified as social centers or relay points. I believe an analogy was used comparing people to neurons in the brain where some neurons are more central to the activity than others. In the advent of the Internet people who function socially as a sort of hub for information can become the catalyst for things that go viral on the Internet and as such they constitute a still small, but relatively high profile target if what they are relaying is counter to what the establishment is saying. These people may seem to be low profile people, but with in the context of social media they are not. It is likely they are secretly considered to have a medium profile in public eye.
Facebook does not let users see how many views their posts have gotten. If they did, people might actually be recognized for being mini-broadcasters by the public at large. As it stands now, only Facebook and the NSA know if you are a mini-broadcaster or not, given that you are not already a public figure with thousands of friends and followers rather than hundreds.
It is plausible that the sophistication of the military who is policing the Internet may very well take into account people who have what they deem is a mini-broadcasting status. If the person in question is broadcasting information that runs counter to the very legal propaganda (see the NDAA) that the military industrial complex is using against the American people, it is possible, that those broadcasters could be targeted to be discredited, harassed or worse.