User:Pecopteris/AFD


User page	Talk Page	To Do List	INFO	AFD	Control Panel

Checkuser pages
Requests: Unlisted • IP check • On hold Archives: Main • Older • IP checks • Unsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk Overview • Noticeboard • Procedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through: WP:RFCU/C/P

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL WP:N WP:CLS WP:LIST WP:RS

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< November 29	December 01 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Any Means Possible

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Little significant coverage in reliable sources. C F A 01:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete per nominator. This subject is not given significant, in-depth coverage by multiple unrelated reliable sources. JFHJr (㊟) 02:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

CaseOh (streamer)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still fails GNG. Little significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. C F A 01:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Internet. C F A 01:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Per nominator. The subject does not enjoy substantial, in-depth coverage by multiple reliable sources. JFHJr (㊟) 01:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Comment: the page history it at Draft:CaseOh1. This page was copy-and-paste moved without the AfC templates. win8x (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
The creator did that because the main space name CaseOh is protected due to repeated recreation. Note the multiple page moves. JFHJr (㊟) 01:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete: I can see that this article doesn't have enough reliable sources and CaseOh is not notable enough for an own article. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 01:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Functionality Equivalence Verification

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub was redirected to software testing years ago, but term is not described there or anywhere else on enwiki. Google suggests the term is related to equivalence checking, or it's possibly related to functional equivalence, but the use of this specific term is unclear. Deletion should be considered unless a proper redirect/merge target can be identified. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Sýn (media corporation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. The first reference cites Sýn's website, the second one its own media outlet Vísir.is. All publications I found either contain trivial info or are news about acquisitions or sales of the company's assets. In brief, the company does not meet WP:ORGCRITE and is not inherently notable, according to the same guideline. Ur frnd (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Companies, Internet, and Iceland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Pretty straightforward WP:NCORP fail. BD2412 T 02:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Beck (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

EP has zero coverage found in a WP:BEFORE. As for the citations present, 2 are database sites (no notability inherited from them), and the third is basically a press release announcing the release. Other language pages do not have any citations other than databases either.

I had previously redirected the page, but it was reverted. Reason give for the reversal was "This is a release by a major artist and therefore notable. Changing it to a redirect broke a bunch of links includlng the Beck chronology." We know that notability isn't inherited, so it doesn't matter how famous Beck is, if this release cannot stand on its own then it does not need to exist and can be mentioned in the Beck article. As for the reason that redirecting it "broke links", that is not a reason for keeping an article. Links can be fixed. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Beck discography per WP:ATD.4meter4 (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Keep – Sufficient coverage in multiple reliable sources. See my additions today including brief but significant coverage in Radio & Records, New Straits Times, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the Wisconsin State Journal and Under the Radar. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm perfectly fine with it being redirected to Beck discography, but it was redirected to Beck (musician) which was very confusing and felt like an error. And yes, broken links can be fixed, but it's not nice to just casually break obvious ones.

Ixat totep (talk) 17:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

As it might not be obvious to all, I'm the one who un-redirected it, so if that makes this a disputed deletion, I'm happy to un-dispute it as long as it goes to Beck discography and not Beck (musician). [EDIT: But now someone added much better and more notable citations so I think it should be kept]

Ixat totep (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

You could have just fixed the redirect to go to the discography and not the musician, just saying. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Donaldd23 I honestly thought there would be a lot more about it to cite. It's mentioned in a bunch of places like it's an important release (or at least as important as other EPs that aren't in danger of deletion). I was surprised I couldn't find more - that's why I left the "notability guidelines" flag up. If we're going to do "you could have..."... Albums are always in chronology carousels, and it's obvious that redirecting one will completely mess up the carousel and make them impossible to use to navigate the discography properly. That's the other reason I un-deleted it. I was clicking through releases and found myself back on the artist page trying to figure out wtf happened and it ticked me off enough to not fully research the page. I wanted the chronology to work and found zero talk page discussion about deletion so it seemed strange. Ixat totep (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Donaldd23 I just went to look at the page to see what to move elsewhere and volunteer to sort it out, but it looks like someone came along and added a bunch of much better citations, including print sources. So now I'd say keep it. Ixat totep (talk) 00:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the new sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Dumper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A dumper is exactly the same thing as a dump truck. It's a different article about the same subject in a different variant of English. Cyber the tiger (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to dump truck. BD2412 T 02:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)