Population tables of U.S. cities |
---|
Cities |
Urban areas |
Populous cities and metropolitan areas |
Metropolitan areas |
Megaregions |
|
This list tracks and ranks the population of the top 10 largest cities and other urban places in the United States by decade, as reported by each decennial United States census, starting with the 1790 Census. For 1790 through 1990, tables are taken from the U.S Census Bureau's "Population of the 100 Largest Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States: 1790 to 1990."[1] For year 2000 rankings, data from the Census Bureau's tally of "Cities with 100,000 or More Population Ranked by Selected Subject" is used.[2] The 2010 rankings are based on the 2010 census results.[3]
The Census Bureau's definition of an "urban place" has included a variety of designations, including city, town, township, village, borough, and municipality. The top 10 urban areas in 1790 consisted of various places designated as cities, towns and townships. The top 10 urban areas in 2010 are all separate incorporated places.
This list generally refers only to the population of individual urban places within their defined limits at the time of the indicated census. Some of these places have since been annexed or merged into other cities. Other places may have expanded their borders due to such annexation or consolidation. For example, after the 1898 consolidation of New York City, the Census Bureau has defined all the boroughs within its city limits as one "urban place". Similarly, Philadelphia's population has included the census counts within both the former urban areas of Northern Liberties, Pennsylvania and Southwark, Pennsylvania ever since Philadelphia's 1854 consolidation.
1790
editWhen the United States declared independence in 1776, Philadelphia was its most populous city. By the time the first U.S. census count was completed in 1790, New York City had already grown to be 14% more populous than Philadelphia (though Philadelphia still had the larger metropolitan population in 1790). Note that, in 1790, New York City consisted of the entire island of Manhattan and that Philadelphia only included the most central neighborhoods of the city.
Rank | City | State | Population[4] | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 33,131 (includes rural areas of Manhattan) | New York has ranked as the city with the highest population in every census count.[a] |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 28,522 (excludes urban neighborhoods outside city proper) | Prior to 1854, the City of Philadelphia only governed the oldest parts of the city, now referred to as Center City. |
3 | Boston | Massachusetts | 18,320 | Listed as a town in the 1790 census; now a city since 1822 and is the capital of Massachusetts since 1632. |
4 | Charleston | South Carolina | 16,359 | |
5 | Baltimore | Maryland | 13,503 | Existed as a town during the time; now an independent city. |
6 | Northern Liberties District | Pennsylvania | 9,913 | A neighborhood of Philadelphia annexed in 1854. |
7 | Salem | Massachusetts | 7,921 | Listed as a town in the 1790 census; now a city. |
8 | Newport | Rhode Island | 6,716 | Listed as a town in the 1790 census; now a city. Only appearance in the top 10. |
9 | Providence | Rhode Island | 6,380 | Listed as a town in the 1790 census; now a city. |
10 | Marblehead | Massachusetts | 5,661 | Still a town. Only appearance in the top 10. |
Southwark | Pennsylvania | 5,661 | A neighborhood of Philadelphia annexed in 1854. |
The total population of these 11 cities was 152,087.
1800
editRankings based on population data from the second United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 81,009 | |
2 | Essex | Massachusetts | 61,196 | |
3 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 61,192 | |
4 | New York | New York | 60,489 | |
5 | Baltimore | Maryland | 59,030 | |
6 | Charleston | South Carolina | 57,480 | |
7 | Dutchess | New York | 47,775 | |
8 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 46,928 | |
10 | Rockingham | New Hampshire | 45,427 | |
9 | Lancaster hillsborough nh | Pennsylvania | 43,899 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 216,346.
1810
editRankings based on population data from the third United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 111,210 | |
2 | New York | New York | 96,373 | |
3 | Baltimore | Maryland | 75,780 | |
4 | Essex | Massachusetts | 71,888 | |
5 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 64,910 | |
6 | Charleston | South Carolina | 63,179 | |
7 | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 53,927 | |
8 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 52,789 | |
9 | Dutchess | New York | 51,363 | |
10 | Rockingham | New Hampshire | 50,175 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 329,346.
1820
editRankings based on population data drawn the fourth United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 137,097 | |
2 | New York | New York | 123,706 | |
3 | Baltimore | Maryland | 96,201 | |
4 | Charleston | South Carolina | 80,212 | |
5 | Essex | Massachusetts | 74,655 | |
6 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 73,625 | |
7 | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 68,336 | |
8 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 61,472 | |
10 | Rockingham | New Hampshire | 55,246 | |
9 | Cumberland | Maine | 49,445 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 405,869. Last time Massachusetts has two cities in the top ten.
1830
editRankings based on population data from the fifth United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 202,589 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 188,797 | |
3 | Baltimore | Maryland | 120,870 | |
4 | Charleston | South Carolina | 86,338 | |
5 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 84,355 | |
6 | Essex | Massachusetts | 82,859 | |
7 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 77,961 | |
8 | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 76,631 | |
9 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 62,163 | |
10 | Cumberland | Maine | 60,102 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 599,927.
1840
editRankings based on data drawn from the sixth United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 312,710 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 258,037 | |
3 | Baltimore | Maryland | 134,379 | |
4 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 106,611 | |
5 | Orleans | Louisiana | 102,193 | |
6 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 95,773 | |
7 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 95,313 | |
8 | Essex | Massachusetts | 94,987 | |
9 | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 84,203 | |
10 | Charleston | South Carolina | 82,661 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 884,291.
1850
editBy 1850, the United States was in the midst of the First Industrial Revolution. Rankings based on population data compiled in the seventh United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 515,547 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 408,762 | |
3 | Baltimore | Maryland | 210,646 | |
4 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 161,383 | |
5 | Hamilton | Ohio | 156,844 | |
6 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 144,517 | |
7 | Kings | New York | 138,822 | |
8 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 138,290 | |
10 | Essex | Massachusetts | 131,300 | |
9 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 130,789 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 1,459,023.
1860
editRankings based on data drawn from the eighth United States Census, the last national decennial census conducted before the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861. This is the first census where the Northeast does not hold a supermajority of the top ten largest cities.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 813,669 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 565,529 | |
3 | Kings | New York | 279,122 | |
4 | Hamilton | Ohio | 216,410 | |
5 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 216,354 | |
6 | Baltimore | Maryland | 212,418 | |
7 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 192,700 | |
8 | St. Louis | Missouri | 190,524 | |
9 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 178,831 | |
10 | Orleans | Louisiana | 168,675 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 2,719,910.
1870
editThis was the ninth United States Census. This is the first census where the Northeast does not hold a simple majority of the top ten largest cities (briefly returns to 6 in the 1910 census). This is also the first census in which every city in the top 10 has a population of over 100,000.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 942,292 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 674,022 | |
3 | Kings | New York | 419,921 | |
4 | St. Louis | Missouri | 351,189 | |
5 | Cook | Illinois | 349,966 | |
6 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 274,535 | |
7 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 270,802 | |
8 | Baltimore | Maryland | 267,354 | |
9 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 262,204 | |
10 | Hamilton | Ohio | 260,370 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 3,697,264.
1880
editThis was the tenth United States Census.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 1,164,674 | |
2 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 847,170 | |
3 | Cook | Illinois | 607,524 | |
4 | Kings | New York | 599,495 | |
5 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 387,927 | |
6 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 355,869 | |
7 | St. Louis | Missouri | 350,518 | |
8 | Baltimore | Maryland | 332,313 | |
9 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 317,830 | |
10 | Hamilton | Ohio | 313,374 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 4,874,175.
1890
editThe 1890 Census was the Eleventh. Four Midwest cities occupied the top ten spots, with two cities from Ohio in the top ten for the first time.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 1,441,216 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 1,191,922 | |
3 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,046,964 | |
4 | Kings | New York | 838,547 | |
5 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 551,959 | |
6 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 484,780 | |
7 | St. Louis | Missouri | 451,770 | |
8 | Baltimore | Maryland | 434,439 | |
9 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 431,167 | |
10 | Hamilton | Ohio | 374,573 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 6,660,402.
1900
editThe 1900 Census was the Twelfth.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New York | New York | 1,850,093 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 1,838,735 | |
3 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,293,697 | |
4 | Kings | New York | 1,166,582 | |
5 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 775,058 | |
6 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 611,417 | |
7 | St. Louis | Missouri | 575,238 | |
8 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 565,696 | |
9 | Baltimore | Maryland | 508,957 | |
10 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 439,120 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 9,487,400.
1910
editThe 1910 Census was the Thirteenth.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cook | Illinois | 2,405,233 | |
2 | Kings | New York | 2,331,542 | |
3 | New York | New York | 1,634,351 | |
4 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,549,008 | |
5 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,018,463 | |
6 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 731,388 | |
7 | St. Louis | Missouri | 687,029 | |
8 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 669,915 | |
9 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 637,425 | |
10 | Baltimore | Maryland | 558,485 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 12,401,322.
1920
editThe 1920 Census was the Fourteenth. Only time three Midwestern cities occupy the top five.
Rank | City | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cook | Illinois | 3,053,017 | |
2 | New York | New York | 2,284,103 | |
3 | Kings | New York | 2,018,356 | |
4 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,823,779 | |
5 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,185,808 | |
6 | Wayne | Michigan | 1,177,645 | |
7 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 943,495 | |
8 | Los Angeles | California | 936,455 | |
9 | Suffolk | Massachusetts | 835,522 | |
10 | Middlesex | Massachusetts | 778,352 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 15,355,250.
1930
editThe 1930 Census was the Fifteenth.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cook | Illinois | 3,982,123 | |
2 | Kings | New York | 2,560,401 | |
3 | Los Angeles | California | 2,208,492 | |
4 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,950,961 | |
5 | Wayne | Michigan | 1,888,946 | |
6 | New York | New York | 1,867,312 | |
7 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,374,410 | |
8 | Bronx | New York | 1,265,258 | |
9 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 1,201,455 | |
10 | Queens | New York | 1,079,129 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 19,042,823.
1940
editFour of the ten cities here would have their first ever population drop in 1940. Though slight, they would presage a precipitous decline that started in 1950. The 1940 census was the sixteenth. This is also the first census in which the total population of the 10 largest cities combined increased by less than 10% from the last census, 10 years ago (<1% per year).
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cook | Illinois | 4,063,342 | |
2 | Los Angeles | California | 2,785,643 | |
3 | Kings | New York | 2,698,285 | |
4 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,015,623 | |
5 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,931,334 | |
6 | New York | New York | 1,889,924 | |
7 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,411,539 | |
8 | Bronx | New York | 1,394,711 | |
9 | Queens | New York | 1,297,634 | |
10 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 1,217,250 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 19,909,825.
1950
edit1950 was a watershed year for many cities in the United States. Many cities in the country peaked in population, but started a slow decline caused by suburbanization associated with pollution, congestion, and increased crime rates in inner cities, while the improved infrastructure of the Eisenhower Interstate System more easily facilitated car commutes and white flight of the white middle class. The G.I. Bill made available low interest loans for returning World War II veterans seeking more commodious housing in the suburbs. Of the eighteen most populous cities in the 1950 census, fifteen have declined in population as of the 2020 census, with the exceptions of New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Although populations within city limits dropped in many American cities, the metropolitan populations of most cities continued to increase greatly. The 1950 census was the seventeenth.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cook | Illinois | 4,508,792 | |
2 | Los Angeles | California | 4,151,687 | |
3 | Kings | New York | 2,738,175 | |
4 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,435,235 | |
5 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 2,071,605 | |
6 | New York | New York | 1,960,101 | |
7 | Queens | New York | 1,550,849 | |
8 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,515,237 | |
9 | Bronx | New York | 1,451,277 | |
10 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 1,389,532 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 21,809,384.
1960
editThe 1960 Census was the Eighteenth. This was the first census (see also 1980) to show a decline in the combined total population of top ten cities, with 826,495 ( 3.8%) fewer people than the 1950 Census' top ten cities.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 6,038,771 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,129,725 | |
3 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,666,297 | |
4 | Kings | New York | 2,627,319 | |
5 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 2,002,512 | |
6 | Queens | New York | 1,809,578 | |
7 | New York | New York | 1,698,281 | |
8 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 1,647,895 | |
9 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,628,587 | |
10 | Bronx | New York | 1,424,815 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 20,982,889.
1970
editThe 1970 Census was the Nineteenth.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 7,041,980 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,492,369 | Population peaked this census. Cook County has hovered around 5 million ever since. |
3 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,666,751 | Population peaked this census. |
4 | Kings | New York | 2,602,012 | |
5 | Queens | New York | 1,986,473 | |
6 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,948,609 | |
7 | Harris | Texas | 1,741,912 | |
8 | Cuyahoga | Ohio | 1,721,300 | Last appearance in top 10. |
9 | Allegheny | Pennsylvania | 1,605,016 | Last appearance in top 10. |
10 | New York | New York | 1,539,233 | Last Appearance in top 10. |
The total population of these 10 cities was 22,028,346.
1980
editBy 1980, the population trends of urban decline and suburbanization that started in the 1950s were at their peak. This was the second census (see also 1960) to show a decline in the combined total population of the top ten cities, with 1,142,003 (5.2%) fewer people than the 1970 Census' top ten cities, mostly due to the large drop in population of New York City. This is the first census in which half of the top ten cities are in the Sun Belt, specifically the West South Central and South Western area of the country.[5] The 1980 census was the twentieth.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 7,477,421 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,253,655 | First ever population drop for Cook County. |
3 | Harris | Texas | 2,409,547 | |
4 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,337,843 | First ever population drop for Wayne County. |
5 | Kings | New York | 2,230,936 | |
6 | Orange | California | 1,932,709 | |
7 | Queens | New York | 1,891,325 | |
8 | San Diego | California | 1,861,846 | First appearance in top 10. |
9 | Miami−Dade | Florida | 1,625,781 | First appearance in top 10. |
10 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 1,509,175 | Last appearance in top 10. |
The total population of these 10 cities was 20,886,343.
1990
editThe 1990 Census was the Twenty-first. Continued trends of western cities' growth and Northeastern cities' contraction now place a majority of the top ten cities in the western portion of the Sun Belt, a regional concentration not seen since Northeastern cities dominated the top of the first seven censuses.[6]
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 8,863,164 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,105,067 | |
3 | Harris | Texas | 2,818,199 | |
4 | San Diego | California | 2,498,016 | |
5 | Orange | California | 2,410,556 | |
6 | Kings | New York | 2,300,664 | |
7 | Maricopa | Arizona | 2,122,101 | First appearance in top 10. |
8 | Wayne | Michigan | 2,111,687 | |
9 | Queens | New York | 1,951,598 | |
10 | Miami−Dade | Florida | 1,937,094 |
The total population of these 10 cities was 21,872,554.
2000
editThe 2000 Census was the 22nd in U.S. history.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 9,519,338 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,376,741 | |
3 | Harris | Texas | 3,400,578 | |
4 | Maricopa | Arizona | 3,072,149 | |
5 | Orange | California | 2,846,289 | |
6 | San Diego | California | 2,813,833 | |
7 | Kings | New York | 2,465,326 | |
8 | Miami−Dade | Florida | 2,253,362 | |
9 | Queens | New York | 2,229,379 | |
10 | Dallas | Texas | 2,218,899 | First appearance in top 10. |
The total population of these 10 cities was 23,899,236.
2010
editSeven of the country's ten largest cities in 2010 were located in the Sun Belt region of the south and west, all of which have far lower population density than their earlier top-ranking counterparts. A different ranking is evident when considering U.S. metro area populations which count both city and suburban populations. The 2010 census was the twenty-third.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 9,818,605 | |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,194,675 | |
3 | Harris | Texas | 4,092,459 | Third county in the U.S. to surpass 4 million. |
4 | Maricopa | Arizona | 3,817,117 | |
5 | San Diego | California | 3,095,313 | |
6 | Orange | California | 3,010,232 | |
7 | Kings | New York | 2,504,700 | |
8 | Miami−Dade | Florida | 2,496,435 | |
9 | Dallas | Texas | 2,368,139 | |
10 | Queens | New York | 2,230,722 | Last appearance in top 10. |
The total population of these 10 cities was 24,513,008.
2020
edit2020 is the first census in which all ten of the largest cities have populations of over one million. It is also the first census since 1940 in which no cities entered or left the top ten, and the first census since 1950 in which all ten cities gained population. This was the twenty-fourth census.
Rank | County | State | Population | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | 10,014,009 | First county to ever surpass 10 million. |
2 | Cook | Illinois | 5,275,541 | |
3 | Harris | Texas | 4,731,145 | |
4 | Maricopa | Arizona | 4,420,568 | |
5 | San Diego | California | 3,298,634 | |
6 | Orange | California | 3,186,989 | |
7 | Kings | New York | 2,736,074 | |
8 | Miami−Dade | Florida | 2,701,767 | |
9 | Dallas | Texas | 2,613,539 | |
10 | Riverside | California | 2,418,185 | First appearance in top 10. |
The total population of these 10 cities was 26,105,017.
Totals
editYear | Total population | Change |
---|---|---|
1790 | 152,087 | NA |
1800 | 216,346 | 42.25% |
1810 | 329,346 | 52.23% |
1820 | 405,869 | 23.23% |
1830 | 599,927 | 47.81% |
1840 | 884,291 | 47.40% |
1850 | 1,459,023 | 64.99% |
1860 | 2,719,910 | 86.42% |
1870 | 3,697,264 | 35.93% |
1880 | 4,874,175 | 31.83% |
1890 | 6,660,402 | 36.65% |
1900 | 9,487,400 | 42.44% |
1910 | 12,401,322 | 30.71% |
1920 | 15,355,250 | 23.82% |
1930 | 19,042,823 | 24.02% |
1940 | 19,909,825 | 4.55% |
1950 | 21,809,384 | 9.54% |
1960 | 20,982,889 | -3.79% |
1970 | 22,028,346 | 4.98% |
1980 | 20,886,343 | -5.18% |
1990 | 21,872,554 | 4.72% |
2000 | 23,899,236 | 9.27% |
2010 | 24,513,008 | 2.57% |
2020 | 26,105,017 | 6.49% |
See also
editReferences
editNotes
- ^ Jackson, Kenneth T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504983-7. OCLC 11785435., Chapter 8: "Suburbs Into Neighborhoods: The Rise and Fall of Municipal Annexation."
Sources
- ^ "Population of the 100 Largest Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States: 1790 to 1990"
- ^ "Cities with 100,000 or More Population Ranked by Selected Subject"
- ^ "U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- ^ "Population of the 24 Urban Places: 1790"
- ^ "Population of the 100 Largest Urban Places: 1980"
- ^ "Population of the 100 Largest Urban Places: 1990"
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1800list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1810list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1820list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1830list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1840list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1850list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1860list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1870list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1880list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1890list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1900list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1910list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1920list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1930list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1940list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1950list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1960list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "1970list" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "2000list_by_ranking" is not used in the content (see the help page).
External links
edit- United States, 1780-1789—discusses population size from 1780 to 1789
- Largest Cities in the United States Over Time on YouTube
- Visualization of Largest cities in the United States by population by decade on YouTube