This page logs recent GA reviews by new reviewers that have less than 3 reviews. Its purpose is to invite feedback from experienced reviewers both to guide new reviewers and to detect invalid reviews that do not follow the review instructions.
If a problematic review is found, the experienced reviewer can contact the new reviewer on their talk page or on the GA review page to explain what the problems are and how to fix them. After some time, they should check back to assess whether the problems have been solved.
In cases where there is no response or where the GA review still clearly falls short of the review requirements despite considerable attempts to guide the new GA reviewer, the review should be declared invalid and the article should be returned to being a GA candidate. This can be achieved by restoring the GA nomination template on the article talk page and either increasing the counter of the page-parameter by one or requesting a deletion of the current GA review page. Deletion should only take place if there is little to no information on the review page.
The assessment of a GA review is finished if either no problems were encountered, if the encountered problems were solved, or if the article was returned to being a GA candidate. After finishing the assessment, the corresponding entry in the list below should be removed.