Plato's Stepchild

I created this new account for a dispute resolution problem I'm currently engaged in. I've created this account so that when we go through the resolution process I won't have to worry about the IP Gods inexplicably changing my IP address right in the middle of the process and potentially make things even more confusing.

For the record, I am the person who made the edits about MASH (the TV show, not the food preparation) that occurred in August, September, October ... 2018 using the IP address of < 173.235.84.234 >. If you happen to read this 20 years from now (will Wikipedia still be around in 20 years? Not if people succeed in killing it), then don't assume I made all of the edits that might be on there between then in now, although I may still make some edits using the IP address. I actually like doing editing using an IP address.

Background (Sorta)

As a retired educator, I often see in every instance an opportunity to learn something new. While I have nothing against lecturing, my preferred pedagogy was something like the old Socratic Circle, where people engage in a discussion in their attempt to “peel the onion” and look for that kernel of truth. For some reason many people today just don't seem to understand this. Perhaps it is one more indictment against modern eduction. Which is why it is all but impossible to have a reasoned discussion on Wikipedia, and consequently useful collaboration. Unfortunately, Wikipedia depends upon the collaboration of its editors, which can be at times rather trying. This difficulty is mainly the product that so many editors are not committed to understanding both sides of a dispute, which requires an willingness to listen to what the other person is saying and trying to understand what his point is, and whether or not it is actually valid. Far to often “discussions” are more like disputes, where editors are more like lawyers arguing a case in court, and instead of trying to understand what the other side is saying, they are ONLY INTERESTED IN WINNING, the truth of the matter be damned. This is a gigantic problem on Wikipedia, and may well be its undoing.

Why aren't more editors concerned about this problem. Do they honestly not understand this issue?

Or do they simply not care?