Plinkit

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Plinkit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Don't forget to cite your sources and be bold when editing. Most of all, enjoy your Wikipedia experience!

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Dabomb87 13:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Dot-com magazines

Dot-com magazines are magazines about business, computers and the Internet published during the Dot-com bubble. Edward (talk) 16:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Peak oil

Hi, can you please take a look at the discussion going on at the peak oil talk page with Environment2100 and lend us a third party's opinion. Should I just let the whole thing go, or this a point worth trying to salvage? I've tried moving the discussion over to his/her talk page to stop filling up peak oil's page. Thanks.[GW]24.225.185.179 (talk) 07:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm going to wait a little while to see what the responce is and then repost the information. It looks like a language misunderstanding that turned into an edit war. [GW]24.225.185.179 (talk) 04:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, (s)he doesn't seem to get it. Is in denial of the sources I listed (two articles about governments discussing the lowering of taxes seems to prove that the discussion exists, no?). If you're still around, can you make another comment?[GW]24.225.185.179 (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know if you come around very often lately, but there's talk of revamping the Peak oil lead, and I thought you might be interested in commenting. NJGW (talk) 00:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Brand licensing

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brand licensing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Brand licensing. Busy Stubber (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Online car shopping

An article that you have been involved in editing, Online car shopping, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online car shopping. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Orlady (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Haunch

Template:Haunch has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Addingrefs ( talk | contribs ) 16:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, a mistake of mine. I intended to nominate Talk:Haunch for deletion. --Addingrefs ( talk | contribs ) 16:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey! Please refer to the new edition of Economy of Asia

Hello Plinkit, we are a group of Cornell student working on a class project to help improve Wiki pages that needs more information. Our group chose the article 'Economy of Asia' and we are planning to add in more information after 2008, especially regulations, policy changes in China and Japan and greater Asia area. Please check out our page and we are eager to hear from you! Yz567 (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)