User:ProcrastinatingReader/sandbox10

Community-authorised discretionary sanctions

The discretionary sanctions process is intended to provide administrators with a rapid means to intervene in topic areas that have proved problematic. The goal is to reduce and prevent future disruption to the project. Use of such tools is often authorised by the Arbitration Committee, usually as part of an arbitration case. Community discussions can also authorise discretionary sanctions for topic areas, described herein.

Definition

The authorisation of "standard discretionary sanctions" by the community means to authorise sanctions for a specific topic area which follow the same procedures as ArbCom-authorised discretionary sanctions, documented at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, including any updates to those procedures and clarifications given at ARCA, except as noted below.

• Conduct which is below the required standard or breaches of page or individual restrictions are reported the administrators' noticeboard for incidents and not the arbitration enforcement noticeboard (AE). Violations of reverting restrictions should be reported to the edit-warring noticeboard.
• Appeals and requests to modify a sanction are made to the administrators' noticeboard, not the arbitration enforcement noticeboard (AE) or to the Arbitration Committee. A request must have a clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved editors at AN to pass.
• The Arbitration Committee may, as part of an arbitration case, vacate any general sanctions placed by the community.
• Requests for procedural clarifications must be made to the Arbitration Committee at ARCA, to prevent creating a forked sanctions regime.
• Sanctions are logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions.
• Templates used to alert and notify editors of discretionary sanctions are specific to community sanctions (see Template:Gs for details).
• Community-authorised discretionary sanctions cannot be used to delete pages.

Authorisation

General sanctions, including discretionary sanctions, may be authorised by community consensus. A request for sanctions should be made at the policy section of the village pump, and the discussion advertised to the administrators' noticeboard. The same process applies for revoking or amending an authorisation for sanctions. The Arbitration Committee may take over a general sanction.

RfC: General sanctions housekeeping provisions

1. Wikipedia:Community-authorised discretionary sanctions is approved as a procedural policy.
2. Wikipedia:Community-authorised discretionary sanctions supersedes and replaces all prior community-authorised general or discretionary sanctions provisions, clarifications, application notes, and any other prior consensuses developed in regards to community-authorised general or discretionary sanctions.
3. [insert some provision about establishing a log, or using Wikipedia:Editing restrictions]
4. All Wikipedia:General sanctions log subpages of active sanctions are redirected to [insert new log page here]. Past sanctions should be copied into the new log.

Optional wikilawyering-prevention clauses:

1. All existing community-authorised general sanctions, including discretionary sanctions, are vacated.
2. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for the following topic areas:
   • all pages related to South Asian social groups
   • all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
   • articles that have strong ties solely to the United Kingdom
   • all pages related to blockchains and cryptocurrencies
   • all pages related to professional wrestling, broadly construed
   • all pages related to post-1978 Iranian politics
   • all pages related to Michael Jackson, broadly construed
   • all pages and edits related to COVID-19, broadly construed
3. The following general sanctions are authorised:
   • Any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, may be semiprotected indefinitely by any administrator.
   • All pages related to blockchains and cryptocurrencies are placed under WP:1RR.
   • All pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant are placed under WP:1RR.
   • All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content related to any conflict between India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.