Wikipedia

User:Rsjaffe/PROD log

< User:Rsjaffe

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2021

edit
  1. Spiculated mass: PROD; notified The Anome (talk · contribs) 23:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: WP:NOTDIC. Dictionary definition, not encyclopedic entry.
  2. Matías De Stefano: BLP PROD; notified RJBowman (talk · contribs) 17:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  3. Slug (projectile): PROD; notified Icairns (talk · contribs) 23:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  4. Character-count integrity: PROD; notified 213.253.40.156 (talk · contribs) 23:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  5. Xylology: PROD; notified 68.211.137.54 (talk · contribs) 23:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  6. Vascular congestion: PROD; notified Saaga (talk · contribs) 23:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  7. Line (electrical engineering): PROD 23:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  8. Revival (theatre): PROD; notified Quill (talk · contribs) 23:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  9. Sylvatic: PROD; notified McDogm (talk · contribs) 23:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  10. On the razzle: PROD; notified 213.78.106.134 (talk · contribs) 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  11. Class (education): PROD; notified Wolfling (talk · contribs) 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  12. Sip (kinship): PROD; notified Leutha (talk · contribs) 23:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  13. Parley: PROD; notified 71.112.176.175 (talk · contribs) 23:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  14. Sarmentose (botany): PROD; notified Brian0918 (talk · contribs) 23:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  15. Secund: PROD; notified Brian0918 (talk · contribs) 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  16. Testing reliability: PROD; notified 171.66.222.155 (talk · contribs) 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  17. Ergatocracy: PROD; notified 219.77.10.127 (talk · contribs) 23:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  18. Sitelet: PROD; notified Parser01 (talk · contribs) 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  19. Alamin: PROD; notified LeoNomis (talk · contribs) 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  20. Apertura tabularum: PROD; notified Brian0918 (talk · contribs) 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  21. Liquidity forecast: PROD; notified Nino Gonzales (talk · contribs) 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  22. Miswart: PROD; notified Samsara (talk · contribs) 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  23. Trafficability: PROD; notified PierreCh~enwiki (talk · contribs) 23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  24. Epeolatry: PROD; notified Zenzizenzizenzic (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  25. Dynamic manipulation: PROD; notified Sanazir (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  26. Tax investigation: PROD; notified HSPDUSIONSK (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  27. Benedictional: PROD; notified JASpencer (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  28. Inclined rig: PROD; notified Fluzwup (talk · contribs) 23:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  29. Torcedor: PROD; notified J.P.Lon (talk · contribs) 23:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  30. Votive office: PROD; notified JASpencer (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  31. Optimal mechanism: PROD; notified Romanski (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  32. Solemnization: PROD; notified Nathan Johnson (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  33. Opening narration: PROD; notified Krator (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  34. Divesting abandonment: PROD; notified Vanished user sojweiorj34i4f (talk · contribs) 23:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  35. Directional well: PROD; notified Mudgineer (talk · contribs) 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  36. Reading Clerk: PROD; notified Topbanana (talk · contribs) 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  37. Mutamadiyah: PROD; notified TopoCode (talk · contribs) 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  38. Tomentum (anatomy): PROD; notified Mark-mitchell-aldershot (talk · contribs) 23:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  39. Lifestyle magazine: PROD; notified Pichpich (talk · contribs) 16:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  40. Autonomous circuit: PROD; notified Kundert (talk · contribs) 16:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  41. Tenancy (law): PROD; notified Ironholds (talk · contribs) 16:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  42. Fire Queen (Fire Department): PROD; notified Mopenstein (talk · contribs) 16:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  43. Unincorporated Urban Community: PROD; notified Bburley (talk · contribs) 16:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  44. Legal benefit: PROD; notified Mcclainman2005 (talk · contribs) 16:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  45. Baghwanan: PROD; notified Softwarengineer (talk · contribs) 16:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  46. Iyabōn: PROD; notified Aurdox (talk · contribs) 16:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  47. Distant Tides: PROD; notified Lolknuth (talk · contribs) 02:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: WP:NALBUM not notable. Also, was created by a sockpuppet that was creating other non-notable heavy metal listings.
  48. Sow's ear effect: PROD 22:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unreferenced, at best a dictionary definition.
  49. Kutaisi Institute of Medicine: PROD; notified AlexZalk (talk · contribs) 19:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nothing in the article is referenced, and I can't find evidence that the school still exists. The official website is dead. Most web references to this school appear to be copied from wikipedia.
  50. General (Zimbabwe): PROD; notified Ekhaya2000 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
  51. Government district: PROD; notified Kevlar67 (talk · contribs) 21:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

edit
  1. Summit County Fairgrounds Arena Complex: PROD; notified Tom Danson (talk · contribs) 03:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: non-notable building
  2. Tower 115: PROD; notified Ondrejsv (talk · contribs) 03:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: non-notable building

November 2021

edit
  1. Zalman Shazar Junior High School: PROD; notified Landlord92 (talk · contribs) 05:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: No references, not even a hint of notability in the text.
  2. Like a thief in the night: PROD; notified Jerzy (talk · contribs) 19:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unreferenced and no indication of notability
  3. Petrel HUG: PROD; notified XdeLaTorre (talk · contribs) 02:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
  4. Take One (song): PROD; notified 5678tmz (talk · contribs) 05:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: no evidence of notability, already have entry for album, no need for individual track entry

December 2021

edit
  1. Caleb K. Zia: PROD; notified LukeVK (talk · contribs) 00:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Only reference is broken. Cannot find any significant coverage of person.

January 2022

edit
  1. The Immunity Zone: PROD; notified Slovichon (talk · contribs) 04:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: No indication of notability whatsoever.
  2. Extension of the Wish: PROD; notified Rokusu (talk · contribs) 04:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  3. Chimera (Andromeda album): PROD; notified Jcolonia (talk · contribs) 04:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  4. Manifest Tyranny: PROD; notified Overture2112 (talk · contribs) 04:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  5. Andromeda (Swedish band): PROD; notified 80.42.14.118 (talk · contribs) 04:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

edit
  1. Gwibber: PROD; notified Lineplus (talk · contribs) 00:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. All primary sources.
  2. Judy Durham (EP): PROD; notified Tobyjamesaus (talk · contribs) 19:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  3. Gas (Gas album): PROD; notified Kaini (talk · contribs) 19:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  4. Jane Richardson (author): PROD; notified 68.61.180.176 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  5. František Brzák: PROD; notified Doma-w (talk · contribs) 00:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
  6. Josef Dusil: PROD; notified Doma-w (talk · contribs) 00:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
  7. List of tourist attractions in Visakhapatnam district: PROD; notified Vin09 (talk · contribs) 02:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  8. List of South African tourist attractions: PROD; notified Gbawden (talk · contribs) 02:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  9. List of tourist attractions in Tehran Province: PROD; notified Grzarban (talk · contribs) 02:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  10. List of tourist attractions in Bath: PROD; notified Rodw (talk · contribs) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  11. List of tourist attractions in Bahrain: PROD; notified 84.68.67.222 (talk · contribs) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  12. List of tourist attractions in Riga: PROD; notified Xil (talk · contribs) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  13. List of tourist attractions in Terre Haute, Indiana: PROD; notified Sweet kate (talk · contribs) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  14. List of tourist attractions in Quincy, Illinois: PROD; notified Lpangelrob (talk · contribs) 02:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  15. List of tourist attractions in Agra: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  16. List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  17. List of tourist attractions in Allentown, Pennsylvania: PROD; notified Phillies1fan777 (talk · contribs) 19:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  18. List of tourist attractions in Anantapur district: PROD; notified Harish.pentapalli (talk · contribs) 22:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  19. List of tourist attractions in Bhopal: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 22:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  20. List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 22:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  21. List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 22:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  22. List of tourist attractions in Charlotte, North Carolina: PROD; notified Loodog (talk · contribs) 22:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  23. Cancer recurrence: PROD; notified CycoMa1 (talk · contribs) 17:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Outdated information, misses lots of subtleties about cancer classifications that greatly affect recurrence rates within the types listed, duplicates information in the main pages addressing each without ensuring that it accurately duplicates the info.

March 2022

edit
  1. List of tourist attractions in China: PROD; notified Chongkian (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  2. List of tourist attractions in Coimbatore: PROD; notified Arunram (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  3. List of tourist attractions in Dehradun: PROD; notified Shyamsunder (talk · contribs) 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  4. List of tourist attractions in Delhi: PROD; notified Best Friend (talk · contribs) 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  5. List of tourist attractions in Edmonton: PROD; notified NorthernFire (talk · contribs) 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  6. List of tourist attractions in Eluru: PROD; notified IM3847 (talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  7. List of tourist attractions in Ganja: PROD; notified Selen578 (talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  8. List of tourist attractions in Greater Orlando: PROD; notified Jamesontai (talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  9. List of tourist attractions in Guntur district: PROD; notified Gnt (talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  10. List of tourist attractions in Hamilton, Ontario: PROD; notified Alan.ca (talk · contribs) 02:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  11. List of tourist attractions in Hong Kong: PROD; notified Chongkian (talk · contribs) 02:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.
  12. List of tourist attractions in Indonesia: PROD; notified Chongkian (talk · contribs) 02:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Policies violated by this page:
      WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.
      WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."
      WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.
      The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.
      WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.
      WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

May 2022

edit
  1. User expectations: PROD; notified Spalding (talk · contribs) 21:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Seems like a rehash of parts of user experience.
  2. Consciousness! (Eric Kloss album): PROD; notified DISEman (talk · contribs) 21:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

edit
  1. Rhonda Pownell: BLP PROD; notified Dandreusa (talk · contribs) 03:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
  2. Pierre Fouyssac: BLP PROD; notified AideDésintéressée (talk · contribs) 23:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
  3. Valynce Te Whare: BLP PROD; notified Joe52add (talk · contribs) 00:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  4. Heinz Werner Wessler: BLP PROD; notified Eskaysingh (talk · contribs) 20:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  5. Yam thapa: BLP PROD; notified Sushilbarali (talk · contribs) 15:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  6. Retro Respective: BLP PROD; notified BenHDev (talk · contribs) 22:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  7. Sabhakunwar Kushawaha: BLP PROD; notified Shubhamchaudhary0719 (talk · contribs) 02:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  8. Mohammad Nurul Amin Piash: BLP PROD; notified The Piash (talk · contribs) 00:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  9. Asadollah Sanii: BLP PROD; notified Sickdearkorat (talk · contribs) 02:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  10. Mika Koide: BLP PROD; notified SirChristopher93 (talk · contribs) 01:12, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
  11. Gopika Ramesh: BLP PROD; notified DIVINE (talk · contribs) 19:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
  12. Iain Greenshields: BLP PROD; notified 3aadamrbx (talk · contribs) 02:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
  13. Brad Bose: BLP PROD; notified Littlefriendlyghost (talk · contribs) 23:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
  14. Viktor Artemenko: BLP PROD; notified Mariaelenaathepizza (talk · contribs) 16:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
  15. Neverov Alexander Nikolaevich: BLP PROD; notified Wasival (talk · contribs) 15:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
  16. M. Ismael: BLP PROD; notified 42.201.233.74 (talk · contribs) 16:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

edit
  1. Evan Doody: BLP PROD; notified Diarmaid Barry (talk · contribs) 08:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  2. Rory O'Connor (Actor): BLP PROD; notified Diarmaid Barry (talk · contribs) 08:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  3. PRANTIK PAKHIRA: BLP PROD; notified Prantik99 (talk · contribs) 21:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  4. Raman k jangwal: BLP PROD; notified Ramanjangwal (talk · contribs) 08:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  5. Pedro Espinosa Lorenzo: BLP PROD; notified Emijrp (talk · contribs) 18:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  6. Djalil Palermo: BLP PROD; notified Bnsolo (talk · contribs) 13:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  7. Michael Fredo: BLP PROD; notified WarFooting (talk · contribs) 15:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
  8. Narottam Lal Joshi: BLP PROD; notified Gboard2022 (talk · contribs) 07:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

edit
  1. List of Schoenus species: PROD; notified Tle003 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Material moved back into Schoenus (plant) as this division of information made it awkward to reference and parent page was very short.

August 2024

edit
  1. Albert j van vuuren: BLP PROD; notified Pinkfloyedaudi (talk · contribs) 20:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rsjaffe/PROD_log&oldid=1239677494"