Wikipedia Evaluation
editWikipedia Article Credibility
edit- References
- Websites ( some linkes didn´t work)
- Articles
- studies
- Most reliable
- most paragraphs are referenced but not all
- some neautral, some bias but the actual article was constructed to see both sides
- bias not neccisarily noted in the sources but in the actual article
- lacks flow
- Conversations in talk
- people making changes tell about the changes and are asking for fact checks
- give the sources they used
- cooperation between editors to make the article good
- Rated
- Part of 4 wiki projects
- all rated start-class, high importance
Essay: Why Wikipedia Matters for Women in Sciences
edit- Learned something new
- mostly men are editors
- that they care to have people of all backgrounds to get a neutral opinion and a complete encyclopedia
- Having good role models for everybody
Policies/guidlines Conflict of Interest
edit- surprises
- how strict it is
- only written by subjects not corperation
- not the same as bias
- no ads
- Summery
- If the subject of the article affects you personally in any way you should not write it.
 | This is a user sandbox of Rtomasd. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |