This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists (ACLA), also known as the Nuremberg Files case, is a landmark legal case under the law of the United States treating the issue of whether or not a published threat, namely in the form of a "wanted poster" or a written "hit list" published in writing in hard copy or online, constitutes a "true threat" or "free speech". This question was posed in the context of objection to violent, radical pro-life activism, further making the case a landmark decision in respect of the abortion debate and Reproductive Rights Law.
In the background of this case is the belief of radical pro-life activists that the murder of physicians who perform abortions is justifiable homicide.
References
editExternal links
edit- "Hit List or Free Speech?", Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report, 2002 Spring Issue, 5 March 2002 [1]
- Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists (ACLA), Opinion rendered by the US District Court for the District of Oregon, 945 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Or. 1996), 18 September 1996 [2]
- Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists (ACLA), Brief of Amicus Curiae Submitted to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the ACLU Foundation of Oregon [3]
- "Constitutional Law. Free Speech. Ninth Circuit Denies First Amendment Challenge to Civil Verdict against Anti-Abortion Activists' Intimidating Posters and Website. Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life Activists, 290 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2002) (En banc), Petition for Cert. Filed, 71 U. S. L. W. 3292 (U. S. Oct. 8, 2002) (No. 02-563)", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 3 (Jan., 2003), pp. 977-985 on JSTOR [4]
- Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists (ACLA), Opinion rendered by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 422 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 2005), 6 September 2005 [5]