User:Saraandressa97/sandbox

Herland

Literary Significance and Reception

This book is significant because it dramatically envisions a fictional utopia presenting the philosophy described in Gilman's critically acclaimed feminist book Women and Economics, by visually demonstrating her critique on the unnatural dependence of females on male breadwinners.In Herland the removal of men incites a new economic freedom of women. Gilman uses this utopia to further prove the theories defined in Women and Economics such as Lester Ward's "Gynaecocentric Theory," which declares that "the female sex is primary and the male secondary in the organic scheme."However, these ideas are grounded in a mode of Separatist Feminism which some argue is detrimental to the feminist movement.

Herland helps establish a very early economic model favoring the female worker by adhering to social reproduction. In "The Waste of Private Housekeeping," Gilman states: "The principle waste in our 'domestic economy' lies in the fact that it is domestic." Gilman sees that the transferring of female domestic labor from the private to the public sphere is the only way to achieve fair compensation for women. In contrast to other forms of economic policy, such as that defined in industrial capitalism, this book exhibits a society where the dominant system of production surrounds the production of children; therefore, mothers are not discriminated in the workplace, but are instead respected for continuing the population.The book satirizes the fact that the intense labor of child care does not fit into the system of labor in the men's world. When Terry expresses that in the U.S. the majority of women stay home instead of "working," the women wonder what he means by saying the women do not "work."--is caring for children not considered work?

Though Gilman's ideas aim to help empower women in the workplace, the ideas of Separatist Feminism also extend into a perpetuation of White Feminism--a branch of feminism that continually neglects the unique issues of women of color. Gilman's talk of eugenics, racial purity, and "servants" all hint at system of white supremacy where the different struggles of working class women of color are not addressed.

Additionally, in an effort to subvert the male-dominated system, Gilman inadvertently transcends this male subjugation into a different form--as Lynne Evans states, "their subjugation to the figure of the child enacts a cultural model that mimics patriarchal structure." In a society that bans abortion and centers all aspects of social, economic, and political life around the production of children, these "Herlanders" are still tied, without will, to their biological roles as mothers.

Bibliography:

1. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution. Boston, MA: Small, Maynard, 1898. A Celebration of Women Writers. Web.
2. Carter-Sanborn, Kristin. "Restraining Order: The Imperialist Anti-Violence of Charlotte Perkins Gilman." Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory 56.2 (2000): 1-36. Project Muse. Web.
3. FUSCO, KATHERINE. “SYSTEMS, NOT MEN: PRODUCING PEOPLE IN CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN'S ‘HERLAND.’” Studies in the Novel, vol. 41, no. 4, 2009, pp. 418–434., www.jstor.org/stable/29533951.
4. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins (1998). Herland. Dover Thrift. P. 83
5. Egan, Kristen R. "Conservation and Cleanliness: Racial and Environmental Purity in Ellen Richards and Charlotte Perkins Gilman." WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 39.3-4 (2011): 77-92. Project Muse. Web.
6. Evans, Lynne. " ‘You See, Children Were The-the Raison Detre’: The Reproductive Futurism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Herland." Canadian Review of American Studies 44.2 (2014): 302-19. Project Muse. Web.

----------

Through this critique I learned the importance of citing all facts, even if they seem trivial. Additionally, I noticed how the introduction is not very fluid, and, in fact, it is rather choppy and rigid, which is unlike most writing I read nowadays in school and outside. I also thought that the second paragraph of the introduction was a bit unnecessary for this particular page (it would be fine in Christine's page), whereas there could have been more information on the book itself, as in a general outline of its structure, and possibly a preliminary introduction of the three ladies' names.