Wikipedia should be consistent, and, most importantly, good.
? | Did you ever realize that these boxes are the equivalent of putting an obnoxious sticker on the back of your company-issued laptop? |
"Bob" | This user has a lot of Slack. |
|
This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.
|
|
You'll usually find me hanging around Recent Changes, reverting crap I come across.
I guess I do stuff here besides that, too.
If you have a problem with an edit of mine, please feel free to discuss it on my talk page.
- Chromium - Primary web browser.
- GNU Emacs - Text editor, only use when edits require more complicated markup.
- Pandoc - Because I can hardly stand using Wiki markup, I use this to convert Markdown text to it. Unfortunately, it becomes basically useless with the more esoteric side of things.
- OpenSUSE Tumbleweed - The only Linux distribution.
- i3 - I was using GNOME before this; It finally clicked for me a while back, and I've never been happier. I've tried out Sway in the past, but ended up going back to i3 every time; Mainly because of issues with Wayland.
- Alacritty - Just works. Under Wayland, I use a more obscure terminal emulator named Foot.
- Toolforge Citer - Literally the only tool needed for citation. I don't like how sluggish Wikipedia's own built-in citation tool is, so I just use this one, which is much faster and just better all around, instead.