|
This user is a foe of the False Emperor of Mankind
|
|
|
|
| Z | This user prefers to side with the Zerg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | This user loves problem solving. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 01000010 | 01001100 01101001 01101011 01100101 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100101 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01110000 01110010 01101001 01100001 01110100 01100101 |
|
|
This user-user will rise against the Man-things, yes-yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainly going to be film, game or book trivia. Politics and real people are so subjective. If someone makes an uncited statement that I can cite, I will, or else it'll get reworded. Consistency is the key, if one line goes because of a reason, so should anything else affected by that reason. Edit wars that occur because people can't decide on whether something should be in or not probably come from it being badly worded. Edit wars that come from inconsistency are best just left to the other person, and letting karma sort it out via a message on the talk page. Thankfully, most people have a brain and want to make this place work. Spelling and grammatical mistakes can expect a passing change if noticed, but people writing like five-year-olds cannot always be fixed so easily. Perseverence is the key.
Haven't made a new page from scratch on Wikipedia just yet, preferring to add input to existing pages, or resolve back-and-forth edits. I don't use the Random Page to find things to change, or the Recent Changes, as almost all are going to be something that in all honesty I couldn't offer guidance with. My first stop is usually to see what's evolved in recent contributions, offer more information if it's come to me, or skip sideways and follow links until I see something I have knowledge of.
Semper Expectus, Nunquam Paratus
