User talk:Soulbust/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

2015 archive.

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Soulbust,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. ~~~~

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dual-threat quarterback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Football League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Super Bowl Champion coaches

Template:Super Bowl Champion coaches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Some praise

I've recently been in contact with Lori Earl (Esther Earl's mother), who said she was very pleased with the accuracy and extensive references in Wikipedia's Esther Earl article. You've been the main contributor to that article, so kudos to you! —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of the most subscribed users on YouTube for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the most subscribed users on YouTube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the most subscribed users on YouTube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PewDiePie

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PewDiePie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Supernerd11 -- Supernerd11 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PewDiePie

The article PewDiePie you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:PewDiePie for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Supernerd11 -- Supernerd11 (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Philip DeFranco Networks & Merchandise

Category:Philip DeFranco Networks & Merchandise, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 13:58, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Phil DeFranco Networks & Merchandise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil DeFranco Networks & Merchandise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil DeFranco Networks & Merchandise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gamaliel (talk) 00:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring PewDiePie (estimated annual readership: 1,600,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Bobnorwal (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Terrific work, my friend!! Bobnorwal (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Max Landis

Template:Max Landis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DFTBA Records

Template:DFTBA Records has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for fixing that

Elway is not really a dual threat quarterback, or at least not the poster child lol. I think Steve McNair was a better picture than Andrew Luck since he isn't even in the table (and isn't really that much of a dual threat just cuz he has legs). I might add the McNair picture back in lol. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice work on your articles created! Karlhard (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip DeFranco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

YouTube Wikiproject Restart

I've just reproposed YouTube Wikiproject Would you still be interested in working on it?

--- :D Derry Adama (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

FAC input

Hi! Since you're a frequent contributor to music articles, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? It's received on editor's comments but no follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 07:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Romantic orientation

Hello! I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to the article of Romantic orientation. It was very useful and I translated the article into Spanish (being also useful the sources you added to back the term). I also saw that you are working on Gray asexuality, so thanks for that as well. I think it's important for all of this to have a place here... but sadly in the spanish Wikipedia there is almost nothing :(. Thanks again, --Lcsrns (Talk) 04:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your contributions to Romantic orientation (very useful) and Gray asexuality. Lcsrns (Talk) 04:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Lcsrns, the scarcity of coverage regarding these two matters -- romantic orientation and gray asexuality -- is because of the scarcity of WP:Reliable sources covering them. See what I stated at Talk:Gray asexuality. And as for romantic orientation...Well, like the Romantic orientation article states, it's usually subsumed under sexual orientation. Furthermore, the identities currently listed there are are usually only used within the asexual community. But, yes, I agree that Soulbust has helped improve the Romantic orientation article. Flyer22 (talk) 04:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Flyer22, we agree on the fact it is usually subsumed under sexual orientation and that it is generally used by asexuals. I personally didn't know the concept of "Romantic orientation" until two months ago and associated sexual orientation as including it. Nevertheless, this two are different, separated things and that is why I am very happy of translating it to Spanish and letting more people know about it (and can't get to it in other way if they don't know English). Information in Spanish is even less... and regarding coverage, I think this wiki has a lot of coverage of sexuality... and I meant that the Spanish one lacked it. About asexuals, yes, we agree... it's usually used by them (and through AVEN I got to know the concept), but that is not in all cases (and I have seen them being used by sexual people)... specially if we say sexual attraction and romantic can be for different sexes or not aligned. Finally, browsing the history I see that you were also a lot into the article... so thanks to you too. --Lcsrns (Talk) 05:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Lcsrns, I haven't done much with that article. You can see me questioning the need for its existence in its edit history; by that, I mean that I'm not convinced that it should be a Wikipedia article. This is because "sexual orientation" and "romantic orientation" usually mean the same thing in research; that's what I meant "subsumed" above. Any of its details could adequately be covered in the Sexual orientation article, and the Asexuality article covers the rest. But, anyway, you are here to discuss this matter with Soulbust. I'll step back from this section now. Flyer22 (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Beemer69 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

DYK for Cassie Cage

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Using Twitter as a BLP source

Please do not use Twitter as a source for BLP articles. It has been established many times over that Twitter, Facebook, and other social media sites are not reliable sources for biographies of living persons. The subject can claim they were born any year that serves their interests, and this detail should be reported by a reliable third party publication before being added to the encyclopedia. If you have any questions you may contact me on my talk page, the BLP noticeboard, or the respetive talk page of the biography in question. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 17:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Darren Korb

added a link pointing to San Jose

Jack Douglass

added a link pointing to Fullscreen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chief Keef

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chief Keef you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Jacedc (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chief Keef

The article Chief Keef you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chief Keef for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jacedc -- Jacedc (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the PewDiePie page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PewDiePie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chief Keef

The article Chief Keef you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chief Keef for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. User:Jacedc (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the PewDiePie page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful, thank you.

Thank you for your wonderful work in creating the Academy Honorary Award template. I'm pruning and refining the category at present. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scare PewDiePie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scare PewDiePie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Eeekster (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Double Take (group) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double Take (group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Take (group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 18:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Scare PewDiePie

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your thanks

Thank you for thanking me for the Rey (character) Star Wars contribution. I'm happy to help and think we all will make it into a great article. Skykiller93 (talk) 20:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)