Actually, nevermind, wikipedia is not a good place for spiritual stuff to be mentioned and it feels like high school drama with power struggles and mob rule. Spiritual articles get attacked as soon as they're up, pertinent people and organizations seem to be blatantly missing, and it's not worth the drama or the fight. If the articles do get put up, they are disparaged by negative people, now that I've looked more closely to what happens to spiritually focused articles in the genre I was wanting to fill in. Look at Eckhart Tolle, Gangaji, many others who are great teachers and well known in their field, do amazing work, and there is just too many people trying to disparage them and say negative things about them instead of staying factual, they do it in the discussion area.
It's not worth the fight, and I am really discouraged about wikipedia. I also notice most spiritually focused people in this particular genre give up and leave, it's just not worth it. It's not the great source of information I thought it might be, or has the potential to be, and it is governed by mob rule that isn't very friendly to spiritual subjects. So I'm moving on.
I can see now why professors strictly prohibit college kids from using wikipedia as a source of information, it is constantly changing and isn't dependable as to whether it is really accurate or not, it is a power game masquerading as an encyclopedia and administrators abuse their rights. There are only about 1500 administrators so they are the ones who determine what wikipedia is all about because people don't even have a chance to improve articles, have intelligent discussions about them, or have input before they are deleted or there are religious bias actions.
Anyway, hope it gets better someday, moving on to better things. I know now that wikipedia is pretty much a farce. It's a nice idea, but the info here is bogus. You may delete me now, as you probably will.