The Signpost: 16 January 2018
edit- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
edit- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
edit- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
edit- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
edit- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Thank You!
editI have translated Your SCP Foundation article to Russian. There wasn't article about SCP Foundation in Russian segment of Wikipedia before it. Without You Russian-language article possibly never would have appeared. Thank you a lot! And sorry for maybe bad English.
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
edit- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
edit- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Thank you very much
editThe RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 11:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
Relisting
editHi, please do not relist AfDs that an admin could reasonably close as delete or soft delete. This includes low comment AfDs (see WP:SOFTDELETE.) WP:Relist bias is an essay on this topic. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies; my relist of Pet the Dog was in error. I'll try to keep a better eye out for soft deletes and not relist them[[. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Bringing Mississippi special election article to FAC
editHey Spirit! Thanks again for helping out with the GAN for Mississippi's 4th congressional district special election, 1981. I think it's probably the most thorough article I've ever written and it's the first time I've ever considered bringing an article to FAC. Do you have any further suggestions or details that you think need to be added to meet WP:FACR? Nomader (talk) 00:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Nomader. I think you've written a strong article, although I was able to spot a couple of issues. Keep in mind that I have no experience with featured articles, so I may not be the most authoritative reviewer. Regardless, I hope this is helpful :
- To pass a FA review, your article needs to be representative of the relevant literature. This requirement was added because someone once nominated an article on the assassination of Lincoln that had almost no book sources. Here, most of your sources are regional newspapers. I would suggest adding some book sources to the article. For example, this book contains a good paragraph on the election, while this book has some nice coverage of both the race and the role of African-Americans in the election.
- Finding these books may be a bit of a pain if you’re not near a major library. There should be some Wikipedia programs that will assist, and the Internet Archive allows people to “check out” around 600,000 books still under copyright here.
- The article should have a bit more detail on the role African-Americans had in Dowdy’s victory. While you mention this in the article, there are quite a few sources that study this in-depth.
- What happened with the WAPT debate? A bit more detail here would be helpful.
Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll be sure to make the edits before taking it to FAC. Also-- thanks again for such a thorough review, it was really terrific stuff. If you ever find a free photo of Liles Williams, be sure to let me know! Nomader (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I couldn’t find a suitable image of Liles. I seriously doubt there’s anything available on the internet, since Liles is an obscure, living figure who flourished during a time in which all photographs are still under copyright law. I’d make a request at Wikipedia:Reward board, and hope for the best. Anyways, good luck with the FAC nomination. If you want a final check-through of the article once you’ve added all the book sources you found, please feel free to drop me a line . Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- I actually found one from more recently on his time in the board here ([1]), but I can't for the life of me find the copyright information for Mississippi state officials and looking at elected officials' pages, seems like they're all under copyright. And will do on the check, thanks so much again for all your help! Nomader (talk) 14:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I couldn’t find a suitable image of Liles. I seriously doubt there’s anything available on the internet, since Liles is an obscure, living figure who flourished during a time in which all photographs are still under copyright law. I’d make a request at Wikipedia:Reward board, and hope for the best. Anyways, good luck with the FAC nomination. If you want a final check-through of the article once you’ve added all the book sources you found, please feel free to drop me a line . Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've added relevant literature to the article and fleshed it out-- let me know what you think. Thanks so much again for all the help here! Nomader (talk) 17:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I've started reviewing the article. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I just finished my review. There's a lot, so I posted my comments at User:Spirit of Eagle/Review of "Mississippi's 4th congressional district special election, 1981". Please feel free to edit the page, or to move it into your own userspace. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I've started reviewing the article. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Wanted to thank you again for your edits-- I've made all your changes sans the debate (I really can't find any more details about it, incredibly frustrating). I did also significantly add to the lead, but figure that it's the part that needs the most feedback. Lemme know if you have any additional comments, and thank you so, so much again for all of your work with me on this article. I couldn't have gotten any luckier with my reviewer here. Nomader (talk) 05:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- I'm very glad I could help. This was a really interesting article, and you've done some incredible work that you should be proud of. I checked over your changes, and the only problem I found was that the "Barone & Ujifusa 1988, p. 653." source doesn't link back to the Almanac of American Politics. Everything else looked good. I also think that your lead does a much better job of summarizing the main article. Going forward, I would recommend having someone experienced with the FAC process check the article over. I'm very good at working with rules and guidelines, but there are bound to be some issues that only someone with experience can highlight and help you with. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
edit- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
edit- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
edit- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
Your request at Wikipedia:Reward Board
editI've done your request at Wikipedia:Reward Board. See Wikipedia:Reward_board#Check_if_newspapers.com_has_this_article. Cheers, L293D (☎ • ✎) 20:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Oh, and also: newspapers.com has no archives for the Columbus Evening Dispatch or the Evening Dispatch, which is probably why I found nothing. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. The article must have come from somewhere, so this really narrows the possible locations. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
edit- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
edit- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Spirit of Eagle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
edit- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
The file File:Logo of the SCP Foundation.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
edit- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
SCP Foundation
editDiscovered this today, via [2]. Sounds fun (I'm a Lovecraft-fan), and I liked the IKEA-story. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm glad my article helped you discover the SCP Foundation; its a pretty cool website if I do say so myself. I'd recommend checking out S.D> Locke's Proposal if you haven't already read it. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Best horrorstory I've read in quite awhile. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
edit- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
Your GA nomination of SCP Foundation
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SCP Foundation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A. Parrot -- A. Parrot (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SCP Foundation
editThe article SCP Foundation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SCP Foundation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A. Parrot -- A. Parrot (talk) 05:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
SCP Foundatione has been nominated for Did You Know
editHello, Spirit of Eagle. I've nominated SCP Foundatione, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. Sudhakarbira (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Sudhakarbira (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
edit- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Three-Quarter Million Award!
editThe Three-Quarter Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring SCP Foundation (estimated annual readership: ) to 836,000Good Article status, I hereby present you the Three-Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Adityavagarwal (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
edit- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
Why can't I get a WikiYanny >:(
editI started the edit war, why is User:7_qz the only one who gets a WikiYanny >:(((( InvalidOStalk 17:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)`
- it's not like i'm desperate or anything
@Spirit of Eagle:, it appears you didn’t read my html comment, because you would’ve found this:
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
You've done some really funny things on April Fools' Day. Have this barnstar that is also invisible on your talk page. InvalidOStalk 17:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC) |
It’s no longer invisible. InvalidOStalk 11:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you! I completely missed that. Looks like I should probably check my HTML a bit more frequently; there might be even more hidden barnstars!Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I just noticed that you closed this deletion discussion – [3] – a minute after I had posted a response to one of the commentators in the article — [4]. I believe the AFD merits further discussion and the ideal response ought to have been a re-list which would have allowed it to run for another week. Can you please reconsider your non-admin closure and re-list the discussion instead? — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 04:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've re-opened the AfD so there is a smidge of time to address this last minute issue. However, I don't feel comfortable relisting since this does look like a pretty clear keep, even with this last issue up in the air. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- That the deletion discussion should be closed as "keep" is not that obvious (although it does seem to be heading in that direction), given that Jackqe and AuthorAuthor do not make policy-based arguments. In any case, thank you for re-opening it and allowing it some more time. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 05:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
edit- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
edit- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
edit- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
Mention
editYou were mentioned. Just in case there might be anything you wish to add I am bringing it to your attention. Bus stop (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
edit- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
edit- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Page details being edited unnecessary need help
editNeed help on page information being edited unecessary L c jais (talk) 08:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- What page do you think is being necessarily edited? Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
edit- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
2019 US Banknote Contest
editUS Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
edit- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editThe Signpost: 29 November 2019
edit- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
edit- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report