 | This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Social_Movements_and_Social_Media_(Spring_2020). |
'The Article Evaluation'
#BELLLETSTALK
Pros of the article.
• The article is neutral.
• External sources for further reading are provided.
• Most of the references advance Bell Let’s Talk funding requirements and donations
• The sources have no biases, are up-to-date with the issues of mental health information, anti-stigma campaigns, and social advocacy.
Cons of the article.
• The name of the article is distracting since the title has no direct inferencing on mental campaign-I would think it is about muteness or verbal disorders.
• The article focuses on corporations and companies on their input towards mental health stability more than the influence on the individual’s mental health.
Areas of improvements
• The report can be improved by discussing the contributions of individuals to the move against mental health discrimination ad backing up with the relevant evidence.
• Further conversations regarding the presentation of the topic to reduce biases towards the participation of corporations should be progressed so that individuals as well can contribute towards the campaign (Wikipedia).