User:Tigers900/Sassafras (soil)/PippaThePup Peer Review
Lead:
editI think that your lead does a good job at giving a quick overview of the topic. It is fairly short, but I'm not entirely sure what else you could add to it without cutting into the body of article. An image in the lead of your article would be a strong addition.
Content:
editThe content in the article is up-to-date and seems to cover all of the important aspects of sassafras. Once again, I think some images here would really help to illustrate the texture and look of the soil. I think that added some dates (if possible) to the history section would help to put it in context a little more.
Tone and Balance:
editThis is a very neutral article, and I think that adding the portion about the limits of sassafras really helps to keep the article neutral.
Sources and References:
editYour sources all seem reliable, and you have a good amount of them. The links all work.
Organization:
editI think that your article is well organized, and it flows well. The way you have broken it down into difference sections makes perfect sense.
Overall:
editOverall, I really like your article, and I think adding images would make for really strong additions.
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)