Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softcom
editContributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softcom.
Fair enough [[User:Edge3]] noted the page was not a paid edit as opined by [[Users:Celestina007]]. I had intended to improve the article and I had made clarifications with User:Celestina007 before this but wouldn't hear me out. It seems more like a witch hunt to me. Rather than offer ways I can improve the article, [[User:Celestina007]] was more interested in how the page will cease to exist and accused me of paid edit. Whereas, there are pages with lesser references, but are being improved on by users daily. Needless to say User:Celestina007 knows these sources are from credible sources from top media in Nigeria (This can be verified by checking the news tag on Google search), but we can scrutinize others since it isn't us that created the page. We edit for Wikipedia for readers and not for ourselves. We all have a career but we choose Wikipedia because we believe every reader deserves access to free and quality information and every voice must be heard. Hence, if you wouldn't mind, I will like to work with you on profiling Technology Organisations in Africa. There is a lot of search on this topic daily as individuals seek investment opportunities in Africa, that is the aim as I mentioned in my talk page. By the way, we have man top technology organisations in developed countries already profiled, we can do the same in other parts of the world.