User:Totent/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Chimelong Paradise
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: This article requires a lot more information, and some contents are incorrect.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Yes, to some extent.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- No
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- It is concise, but can be furthur improved.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Yes
Is the content up-to-date?
- No
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- A lot more can be added to this page.

Is the article neutral?
- Yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- No
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Yes
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes
Are the sources current?
- No. Some sources are outdated.
Check a few links. Do they work?
- Yes, they do.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- No. Grammar needs to be improved, and contents need to be easier to read.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Yes
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- No

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Yes
Are images well-captioned?
- Yes
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- I am not sure
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- Yes. The images are listed in table view

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- There are not many topics on the talk page. There is one topic related to Chimelong Paradise's past edit, and it was done in 2016.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- The article Chimelong Paradise is rated as Stub-Class, meaning that it requires more information. It is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject China.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- The topic is about external links to the article rather than the article's content.

What is the article's overall status?
- The article needs more content.
What are the article's strengths?
- The article includes many images that are eye-cathing, and the images are formatted nicely.
How can the article be improved?
- Grammar, consistency of date format, and spelling can be improved. Up-to-date information should also be added.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- The article is underdeveloped.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~