 | This is a user sandbox of UkuleleJim. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Pueblo linguistic area (All info here[not from the original article] Mithun 1999 sourced p.318; Campbell 1997 p.339-340).
Intro Paragraph: There are also many shared cultural practices in this area. For example, these cultures share many ceremonial vocabulary terms meant for prayer or song.[1]
The languages belong to five different families: Zuni, Tanoan, Keresan, Uto-Aztecan (Hopi), and Athabaskan (Navajo, from the Apachean subfamily). Zuni is a language isolate.
..."relative newcomers to the Southwest." Languages in the Tanoan and Apachean families, and additionally Hopi, can be compared to relatives not affected by this particular region's areal features as a reference for changes due to contact.[1]
Shared Traits and Aereal Features
edit- Languages share SOV word order (though inherited from proto-languages in the case of Navajo (Proto-Athabaskan) and Hopi (Proto(-Northern)-Uto-Aztecan)[2]
- aspirated consonants[2]
Ejectives Paragraph: "Navajo has..." Navajo may have acquired the stop /kʷ/ from Puebloan contact.[2][3] Sherzer suggests that contact led to Acoma Keres sharing glottalized sonorants and glides with Navajo.[4]
Zuni may have obtained its partial glottalized set via contact with Tanoan and Keresan, which both have fully integrated series of glottals.[2]
Other shared traits include Santa Clara acquiring retroflex sounds from Keresan and the Navajo acquiring /hʷ/ from Tanoan contact.[1] Keresan may be the common source of glottalized nasals and semivowels in Navajo, and the development of /r/ in dialects of Tewa and Tiwa and possibly Hopi.[1]
Linguist Paul Kroskrity argues for diffused Apachean traits in Tewa, such as the passive marked by prefixes that are structured differently from those of other Tanoan languages.[2][5][6][7] In these languages the verb is made intransitive by allowing an agent argument in the verb structure.[2][5][6][7] This also includes patient subjects and cases where the subject must be animate, including raising animate objects to the place of inanimate subjects.[2][5][6][7] Further, Navajo and Tewa are the only languages in this group to have a "recognizable anaphor as a relativizer" when forming relative clauses.[2][8] Kroskrity also finds similarity in the Tewa possessive suffix -bí, which parallels the third person possessive prefix bi- found in Apachean languages.[9][10][6][7] This can be seen in the following example provided by Kroskrity:[11][10][6][7]
| Language | Example | Morpheme Analysis | English Gloss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Tewa | sen-bí kʰaw | [man-POSS song] | '(a) man's song' |
| Navajo | bisóódi bi-tsi | [pig POSS-flesh] | 'the pig's flesh' |
This paralleling morpheme is also used in these languages' postpositional constructions.[11][10][6][7] The reason for this diffusion has been attributed to trade networks and Apachean settlements near Pueblos in winter months.[11]
Vowels
editSherzer suggests that the 2-2-1 vowel system found in Tanoan languages (i, e, a, o, u) may be a result of contact with Zuni and Keresan language families.[2] Sherzer states, "A 2-2-1 vowel system is a Pueblo-cintered regional areal trait. Its development in some Tanoan languages may be due to contact with Zuni and Keresan."[12]
Notes
edit- ^ a b c d Mithun 1999, p. 318.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Campbell 1997, p. 339.
- ^ Sherzer 1976, p. 151-152.
- ^ Sherzer 1976, p. 137.
- ^ a b c Kroskrity 1982.
- ^ a b c d e f Kroskrity 1985.
- ^ a b c d e f Kroskrity 1993, p. 60-66.
- ^ Kroskrity 1982, p. 65.
- ^ Campbell 1997, p. 339-340.
- ^ a b c Kroskrity 1982, p. 66.
- ^ a b c Campbell 1997, p. 340.
- ^ Sherzer 1976, p. 133.
Bibliography
edit- Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kroskrity, Paul V. (1985). Areal-historical influences on Tewa possession, IJAL 51, 486-489.
- Kroskrity, Paul V. (1982). Language contact and linguistic diffusion: the Arizona Tewa speech community, in Bilingualism and language contact: Spanish, English, and Native American languages, 51-72.
- Kroskrity, Paul V. (1993). Language, history, and identity; ethnolinguistic studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
- Sherzer, Joel. (1976). An Areal-Typological Study of American Indian Languages North of Mexico. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.