Article Evaluation
- on initial look the suggestion of merging another article to the current article i find distracting. I think it is something great to add into the content but on initial look it is just distracting. Everything in the article is relevant
- The article seems to remain neutral while trying to explain the content. I find when trying to explain what digital divide is it can come off biased in some circumstances. The topic itself is trying to show varying populations so it often can come off biased.
-The digital friendly area is overly mentioned in my opinion. The non-digital friendly is not mentioned very much.
- Upon checking through sources, the second source did not come up. The link was not supported. After checking other sources they did work.
- Each source is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. The information comes from libraries and universities. Majority of articles are unbiased.
- None of the information seems to be out of date.
- I found some interest in the talk page of things that need to be added to the page. A more global approach to be added into the article seems to be essential to better the page.
-On the talk page I feel the discussion was kind of like a blame game which is not what we have discussed as protocol in class.
 | This is a user sandbox of Wclapp1. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |