Thematic organization?
Natural philosophy is the philosophy of nature. It seeks to address the basic question, "why is the world thus, and not otherwise?"
Existence vs. non-existence
editThe broadest conception of Nature is the definition of the medieval philosopher Johannes Scotus Eriugena, who defined Nature as simply everything: everything that exists and everything that does not exist. In this definition, time is not considered; thus, it is more proper to say that Nature includes everything that exists, has existed and will exist, as well as everything that does not exist, has never existed and will never exist.
Eriugena's all-embracing definition of Nature has not been adopted by later philosophers, but it seems pertinent to understanding the peculiar behaviour of quantum physics, particularly the path-integral formulation of Feynman. According to the present understanding, Nature explores all possible realities, but allows only one to exist. Expressed mathematically, all possible realities contribute equally to the probability amplitudes for the various outcomes of an experiment; however, only one outcome is chosen to be objective reality in the process of quantum measurement, also known as the collapse of the wavefunction. In this way, even that which does not exist (all possible realities) can influence that which does exist (the objective reality); the non-existent is as much part of Nature as the existent. This broad conception of Nature is also anticipated somewhat in the Buddhist doctrines of shunyata and interdependent development of reality.
Schein vs. Sein
editThe bent rod in water example
what are the real objects and what laws govern them?
Aristotle's primary vs. secondary vs. generalized changes
Unification of matter
editThales, father of science = water
Heracleitus = fire air earth
Empedocles = why quibble? take all four ;)
More esoteric: "το εν" of Parmenides and his student Zeno — there can be only One ;) Numbers, music, geometry of Pythagoras
atomic theory: Democritus, Leucippus
Reality of change; concept of the continuum
editExample of the pendulum; velocity is exactly zero at endpoint of swing - how can it ever leave that point?
Conservation laws
editOrigen's concept of conservation of soul inspired conservation of momentum/energy
Form and matter; space-time and matter
editAristotle's distinction
space-time acts reciprocally on matter the geodesic motion of matter and the conservation of energy-momentum are properties of space-time: the continuity of curvature and the Bianchi relations
Field theories
editfield theories vs. action at a distance
continuum vs. discrete
Causality
editAristotle's four causes
Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason
Leibniz's pre-established harmony; appearance of causality without any; monadology
intrinsic stochasticity of QM
Time reversibility
editFor every fundamental event, there must be a time-reversed fundamental event in Nature
Used by Einstein to argue for photons in 1909; discrete emission events imply discrete absorption events
particle-antiparticle duality as well
Arrow of time defined by thermodynamics, and by cosmological events
Identity
editIdentical particles
Leibniz's egg/soul
Symmetry
editBuridan's ass
minimization principle apparent teleology
Relation to theology
editMaupertuis
Newton's sensorium
Role of experiment
editargued from data but not rigorous hypothesis testing sometimes shockingly mystical in early days
Insights of special relativity
edittranslational invariance invariants of four-vectors are real, not those of three-vectors
Questions posed by quantum mechanics
editmeasurement problem EPR paradox
Perturbative renormalizability and string theories
editmoving beyond the reach of experiment; return to natural philosophy?