Usage
edit"other" is the only optional argument.
{{User:Wugapodes/assessment
| well-written = is the prose good?
| structure = does the article have good structure?
| understandable = is the article accessible to non-experts?
| sourcing = inline citations, references, etc
| coverage = does the article cover the topic?
| npov = is the article free of npov problems?
| figures = does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables?
| other = anything else you took into consideration?
| rating = what rating did you give it?
| comments = suggestions for improvement
}}
- Prose Quality
- Well-written is the prose good?
- Structure: does the article have good structure?
- Understandable: is the article accessible to non-experts?
- Verifiability: inline citations, references, etc
- Coverage of Topic: does the article cover the topic?
- Neutral Point of View: is the article free of npov problems?
- Supporting Material: does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables?
anything else you took into consideration? Overall rating: what rating did you give it?
suggestions for improvement