Usage

edit

"other" is the only optional argument.

{{User:Wugapodes/assessment
| well-written = is the prose good?
| structure = does the article have good structure?
| understandable = is the article accessible to non-experts?
| sourcing = inline citations, references, etc
| coverage = does the article cover the topic?
| npov = is the article free of npov problems?
| figures = does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables?
| other = anything else you took into consideration?
| rating = what rating did you give it?
| comments = suggestions for improvement
}}
  • Prose Quality
Well-written is the prose good?
Structure: does the article have good structure?
Understandable: is the article accessible to non-experts?
  • Verifiability: inline citations, references, etc
  • Coverage of Topic: does the article cover the topic?
Neutral Point of View: is the article free of npov problems?
Supporting Material: does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables?

anything else you took into consideration? Overall rating: what rating did you give it?

suggestions for improvement