User:WyattFranks/Menathais intermedia/Bibliography
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
editEdit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
[1] This is a website with the taxonomy of the Menathais Intermedia and has been retrieved from the author (Kiener, L.C., 1835), yet not too sure from which book the information came.
[2] This book is published in 2008 and based off an encyclopedia. It is limited solely to marine gastropods and because it is so recent, it is up to date with many newly found shells, many of them the author actually has in his personal collection.
[3] Mariam Websters Dictionary's definition of a rock shell.
Examples:
|
References
edit- ^ "Hardy's Internet Guide to Marine Gastropods: Menathais intermedia". conchology.be. October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Robin, Alain (January 1, 2021). Compendium of Marine Gastropods. ConchBooks & AFC. ISBN 9783948603182.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: year (link) - ^ "Definition of ROCK SHELL". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2023-10-16.
Outline of proposed changes
editClick on the edit button to draft your outline.
Outline:
Utilize source 1 to list the taxonomy of the menathais intermedia.
Utilize the remaining sources to break down the information from the taxonomy so that people with no initial knowledge of these species will be able to learn what it is.
Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |