- no sources
{{Unreferenced|{{subst:DATE}}}}
- just one source
{{One source|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (September 2010) |
- too few sources
{{Refimprove|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
- unreliable source(s)
{{Unreliable sources|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
- no footnotes
{{No footnotes|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (September 2010) |
- too few footnotes
{{More footnotes|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (April 2010) |
- original research
{{OriginalResearch|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article possibly contains original research. (September 2010) |
- advertisement
{{Inappropriate tone|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (September 2010) |
- advertisement
{{Advert|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article contains promotional content. (September 2010) |
- no context
{{context|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.(April 2010) |
- too technical
{{Technical|article|reason=|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(April 2010) |
- too confusing
{{confusing|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (April 2010) |
Article
edit{{Article issues}}
References
edit- no sources
{{Unreferenced|{{subst:DATE}}}}
- just one source
{{One source|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (September 2010) |
- too few sources
{{Refimprove|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
- unreliable source(s)
{{Unreliable sources|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
Footnotes
edit- no footnotes
{{No footnotes|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (September 2010) |
- too few footnotes
{{More footnotes|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (April 2010) |
POV
edit- original research
{{OriginalResearch|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article possibly contains original research. (September 2010) |
- advertisement
{{Inappropriate tone|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (September 2010) |
- advertisement
{{Advert|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article contains promotional content. (September 2010) |
Confusing
edit- no context
{{Technical|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.(April 2010) |
- too technical
{{Technical|article|reason=|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(April 2010) |
- too confusing
{{confusing|article|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (April 2010) |
Section
editReferences
edit{{Unreferenced|section}}
{{One source|article}}
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (September 2010) |
{{Refimprove|section}}
This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
POV
edit{{OriginalResearch|section|{{subst:DATE}}}}
This section possibly contains original research. (September 2010) |
Obsolete
edit {{Citations missing}}
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |