User:Yamakiri/Archive 4

Whoa

I didn't notice that he was sockpuppeting--Angel David (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

How come Dave's 2,4,and 6 accounts were blocked?--Angel David (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay

Very interesting :)--Angel David (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

What guy? Who cursed?--Angel David (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Hell's not a curse...is it?--Angel David (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yeah. My bad--Angel David (talk) 01:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:Is this you?

No it isn't. You might want to come here. This is a Wiki which is much like the shops which were deleted. Marlith (Talk) 03:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

This is me. Marlith (Talk) 05:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Well

I only got the first part the rest appearss to be "grown-up talkish".--Angel David (talk) 02:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The woman in the song seems to be saying to her boyfriend, she's because of she wasn't valuable for him. By the way let's look at what Scar's Lion King Cabal is up to [1]. Oh no plotting against Mufasa again *sighs*--Angel David (talk) 13:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

RE:I did it, did you?

No, my school doesn't use a block schedule. I am still in eighth grade at Cathedral, so I will not get something like that until next year (which I do look forward to very much). Marlith (Talk) 16:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not in High School either. I'm still in the 8th grade. The guidance office likes to have 1/2 a year to schedule. Yamakiri ^T_C § 02-6-2008 • 20:32:38

And how is that revalent to anything. I just thought that your name was Andrew Kanode and that that account might be tied to you. Marlith (Talk) 21:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, Marlith (Talk) 22:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

What link might you want me to take down? Marlith (Talk) 22:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh that! I was using a shared IP address, AOL back then, now my IP changes frequently. Marlith (Talk) 22:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

¨ article

Please stop changing the ¨ into a useless disambiguation page. The Umlaut (diacritic) article refers to a general sense of the symbol, not the symbol specifically in German. I posted a comment at the bottom of the article, but appearently you have seemed to ignore it. Plus, your disambiguation page contains a link to another disambiguation page at umlaut. The correct article for the symbol in German is Germanic umlaut. However, we already have an article about a general sense of the symbol, which is located at Umlaut (diacritic). It seems totally redundant to have a disambiguation page, as the umlaut (diacritic) article already contains links to the specific cases - diaeresis and Germanic umlaut. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 20:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Right <name removed>

WTF!? Sarah isn't with me (well I'm home now but she still wasn't). PS. I'm going to mess up your sheets. Andrew Kanode (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey <name removed>, I've got (literally) a week to learn Visual Basic 6 before I go to a competition. YOU managed to convince me it was C++, so I joined. Since I don't have a clue about VB6, how would I use it? Also, where are you? Andrew Kanode (talk)

You're lucky you're on a day trip. *Locks computer with BIOS unaccessable* Andrew Kanode (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Shame on me

You're absoulutely right its just so tempting to edit here (remember these guys). I have to stop. But how?--Angel David (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm straight n' single--Angel David (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't live in California. I'm a New Yorker. And I didn't know that was British. Not that there's anthing wrong with it. Not at all. But that was a mistake. Whats next I'm going to use European Spanish? ¿Es ethe verdad? *crowd laughs*--Angel David (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Amperio hora, tan el su aprender también. Puesto que, soy hispánico yo pida que mi mamá y papá me ayuden a aprender mi cultura--Ańgel Davìd 00:22, 29 Marzo 2008 (UTC)

Oops

I about each word in its literal meaning. I'm such a dufus. *David slaps hiself numerous times*--Angel David (talk) 16:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Titin

The article on titin and its discussion are clear about not adding the full name. Novangelis (talk) 02:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

FOAD

You tagged the soft redirect at FOAD for G6 speedy deletion, and it was removed. I would like to ask why. G6 is for housekeeping, and I'm wondering what housekeeping was needed on it. As far as I can tell from the deleted history, it was a valid soft redirect to a definition article over on Wiktionary. So I'm wondering what about it needed to be cleaned up that needed it's deletion. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

A little challenge

You might remember our little duel last August which we never finished (Parliament House, Canberra vs Gloucester County). How would you like to start a new, article-improving duel to settle the fight? Marlith (Talk) 03:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Dang, I would have done World War II if we were to duel. THAT THING IS ONLY A B-CLASS ARTICLE!!! Marlith (Talk) 23:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dragon Treasures

A tag has been placed on Dragon Treasures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

The COOKIE MONSTeR ate the cow

Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 01:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I...

I don't what to say conflict in my brain.*conscience argues*--Angel David (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

What's there?--Angel David (talk) 22:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Uhhhhh...*drools*--Angel David (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I would like to join.--Angel David (talk) 23:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't know--Angel David (talk) 23:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

YAY

		Fattyjwoods' Super Duper Letter Counting Challenge
		Congratulations Yamakiri you have successfully completed Fattyjwoods' letter counting challenge. This means that you are able to display this cool barnstar on your userpage - but don't tell anyone else the answer!! :) Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button}

Congrats! Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 04:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

removed

Message deleted by Yamakiri Yamakiri ^T_C § 06-15-2008 • 18:54:21

Re Wikimapia..

See WP:EL which says that Wikipedia shouldn't link to material whose (C) Status is unclear.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment

== Wikimapia ==

Please refrain from using Wikimapia links, as they are under scrutiny from the editing community, and wikimapia is not affiliated with the Wikimedia corporation. Instead, we are using {{coord|12.345678|98.765432}} in the form {{coord|lat|lon}}. I have posted this message because I noticed you have several dozen links posted to Wikimapia, that are clogging up linksearch. Yamakiri ^T_C § 06-17-2008 • 19:28:03

Would you be willing to give me more specifics of "they are under scrutiny from the editing community" . Are you asking me to not post to Wikimapia.org in the Wikipedia box ? or are you asking me not to post an "External link" from Wikimapia on a Wikipedia article ? Thanks for your notice rkmlai (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if this seems dense, but what is "C" status ? Are you asking me to unlink all the wikimapia links to wikipedia that I have placed ? I read the EL but don't understand what it is saying, except that wikimapia might not have history of stability or that it is an "open wiki" ? I checked out Sfan00 IMG and am still confused as Sfan00 IMG conversations are spanning different pages. Thanks for your efforts on clarifying this issue for me rkmlai (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

In my desire to understand, evaluate and comply, would you mind finishing your thought on my talk page ? :) Thanks,

rkmlai (talk) 05:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop!

Stop messing with Lucifer_Cat LuciferTiger (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimapia

Greetings Yamakiri,

If you read User_talk:Sfan00_IMG#Please_stop you will see that Sfan00_IMG has now agreed to revert most of the Wikimapia links he has removed. Perhaps you should stop too.

There is some history to this that you may not be aware of that - Sfan00_IMG tried a similar exercise some months ago. He was stopped on that occasion as well.

One of the issues is that while Coords/GeoHack work well in articles about sizeable places (regions, cities, towns, etc) they do not work well for articles that talk about individual buildings, monuments, etc. For these there is a lot of advantage in linking to a large scale, annotated satellite view.

A second issue is this: If it's acceptable to link to Wikimapia (for example) from within GeoHack why does it become a copyright problem when linked directly?

Also, for future reference, please note that the way you have gone about the edits has not always been as constructive as you might think. Simply replacing text with coords has damaged the readability of quite a few of the articles you've touched. That's always a danger when attempting mass changes (speed being the enemy of quality). I will be reverting these over the next few days.

You seem to be a busy and enthusiastic contributor to Wikipedia. Keep that up. But take care who you choose as your mentors...

-Arb. (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

It's good work that you're doing, but sometimes it indeed is losing some of the information that was included in the link, namely the scale of the feature. Note that in addition to the coordinates, you can also give the type of the feature the coordinates are for. It also implies the scale, which is general information that can be used by any map service to give a view with an appropriate scale. In most cases the type alone is sufficient, but sometimes with exceptional features a scale can be added too. For more information see Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#type:T. --Para (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The reverts were to articles where a conversion of a link to a {{coord}} wasn't possible because the link didn't have the relevant information to enable a conversion., I plan on doing some reviewing of edits soon anyway..

Links that stayed removed, were those duplicated by an exisitng coord tag, in which case sourcing the coord data would be appreciated i.e what it should read is Coordinates: <blah>,<blah> via <named source> in respect of title coords, or (<blah>,<blah> <reference link>) in respect of inline links. which to me would be an acceptable compromise.. Next task tagging article that need geo-data sourcing :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Geo - Coords

Stop converting until you've read - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates#Parameters and 'tightened' up the existing conversions.. BTW You CAN use source:Wikimapia from the looks of the param documentation) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Sfan is right on that. When people have misconceptions that coordinates are inappropriate for buildings and monuments, like Arb did above, you should demonstrate how they work just fine. People have formatted most external map service links so that the link leads to a view that shows the object in its entirety but as close as possible, so they're giving information for one specific service to show the object. That's more information than just coordinates, but it's not for general use like other Wikipedia information. So to fix that, we need to include enough information in the article to allow people to see the article's object in other services if they're not happy with the information in Wikipedia; not by saying what parameters and zoom levels to use in each and all external services, but by describing the object in a consistent way and let other Wikipedia structures translate that to zoom parameters and whatnot. That's where the type and scale parameters come in, and all you need to do to improve your conversion is include one or both of those and test some of the first conversions so that they give a similar view. --Para (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)