!nterested Reader
Joined 16 November 2018
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Drmies in topic September 2019
August 2019
editHi, Interested Reader, welcome to Wikipedia. You removed a lot of well-sourced criticism, together with the sources, from AfriForum. Please don't remove things just because they don't throw a good light on the organization — Wikipedia is supposed to be a neutral encyclopedia. Are you connected with AfriForum in any way? Bishonen | talk 09:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC).
False content
editHello, who initially added the content because it is not true? It is misleading and not objective information at all.
- Who added it? I don't know. Probably many people added it incrementally. Anyway, "Who added it?" may not be the most relevant question to ask. Please open a discussion on the talkpage to argue your case and try to get consensus for the changes you wish to make. You can see in the page history that the editor reverting your changes has also asked you to discuss on the article's talk page. Please start a new section at the bottom of the talkpage with an informative header. Note: please sign all talkpage posts by typing four tildes, (~~~~). That will be automatically converted to your signature and a timestamp when you save. Finally, could you please answer my question "Are you connected with AfriForum in any way?" It's rather important, as any conflict of interest needs to be openly declared. Bishonen | talk 11:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC).
Thank you
editNo not related. Just followed one of their cases and noticed a lot of inconsistencies in the media and the wikipedia page. It seem only one sided. Thank you for your advice. !nterested Reader (talk) 12:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.