Æy Æy Æy
Joined 2 July 2022
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Æy Æy Æy in topic January 2024
Seriously though
editDoes anyone actually look at talk pages? Æy Æy Æy (talk) 04:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
editPlease refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Character.ai for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's an unbiased website though??? Æy Æy Æy (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Article talk pages are not for general discussion about the subject of the article. - Aoidh (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- What I put was directly related to the page subject though Æy Æy Æy (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- This was not. - Aoidh (talk) 05:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was a reply to your message. It was in context to YOUR message. Æy Æy Æy (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was not a reply to anything I wrote, as I did not participate in the section titled Ce sorshi. Ultimately that entire discussion was off-topic, which is why is was removed, but your comment in particular had nothing to do with discussing the article in any context, which is the purpose of article talk pages and why I left the above comment, so that you would be aware of this since your comment on the article's talk page suggested the opposite, that's all. - Aoidh (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh I must've replied to the wrong discussion. Sorry man. Æy Æy Æy (talk) 04:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- It was not a reply to anything I wrote, as I did not participate in the section titled Ce sorshi. Ultimately that entire discussion was off-topic, which is why is was removed, but your comment in particular had nothing to do with discussing the article in any context, which is the purpose of article talk pages and why I left the above comment, so that you would be aware of this since your comment on the article's talk page suggested the opposite, that's all. - Aoidh (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was a reply to your message. It was in context to YOUR message. Æy Æy Æy (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This was not. - Aoidh (talk) 05:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- What I put was directly related to the page subject though Æy Æy Æy (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Article talk pages are not for general discussion about the subject of the article. - Aoidh (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)