İlknur sevtapli

Hello

Northern Cyprus

You have violated WP:3RR at Northern Cyprus. If you revert the edit again, we will report you for edit warring which may result in blocks on your editing privileges. If you want to discuss the issue, then do so at Talk:Northern Cyprus, not in your edit summaries. --Taivo (talk) 21:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Taivo, whenever you are disproven, you are distorting the ground. Sometimes you say WP:3RR (3 revert rule), sometimes claim sockpuppetry. 17 May 2010: WP:3RR 18 May 2010: Sockpuppetry 19 May 2010: ??? By what will you accuse me tomorrow? İlknur sevtapli (talk) 13:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

You've been reported on the Edit Warring noticeboard page, not only with regard to edit warring and 3RR, but also with an allegation that you may be a previously banned user editing under a new identity (i.e., a sockpuppet). If you are not in fact a sockpuppet of the banned user Justice Forever, I would strongly encourage you to respond on WP:ANEW with specific evidence showing that you are not that user. Ad-hominem attacks (such as this on the Northern Cyprus talk page) are likely to be interpreted as meaning the sockpuppet allegations are true. Richwales (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Indef

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a sock of Justice Forever. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:.C4.B0lknur sevtapli reported by User:Taivo (Result: Indef). EdJohnston (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

İlknur sevtapli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• Richwales: "There will surely be ardent nationalists on both sides who will insist that anything that doesn't agree 100% with their POV is horribly biased the other way, but we obviously can't (and shouldn't) go along with their demands". I am not ardent nationalist. I think you placed your point before the subject is matured enough. For example, I thought that you will change your idea when you learn that "There is no buffer zone between North Cyprus and UK SBA", which the "..streches between Northern Cyprus and the rest of the island.." clearly indicates the otherwise. If there is a consensus on "..streches between Northern Cyprus and the rest of the island..", then that is really important for me, you can be sure that when I am unblocked, I will not change the consensus. I really did not understand that there is a consensus on this. Because, one user make an edit and used "there is a consensus" in the edit summary. I thought reasonably therefore that the consensus is peculiar to him. * Dr.K.: "Thank you for the clarification. I agree with you. In a situation as historically involved and complicated as this no one can really be completely happy with any proposed version.". Dr. K. is right: In a situation as historically involved and complicated as this, the wordings may not be immediately agreed by the editors. For forming robust ground, editors should discuss the issues in the Discussion page more and more. * About the sockpuppetry: I am tried to be banned for different kind of reasons (see above). I think, I sould discuss more in the Discussion page rather than in the Article. This way, after consensus exist, somebody (other than me) should change the article. Sorry for the inconvience. My aim was not to be a trouble. I tried to make the ground more robust, as Dr. K indicated my edits with "good faith". Somebody indicated the use of capitals in the edit summaries. I used capitals only when I wanted to emphasize something that really matters. My edit summaries with small letters well exceeds that of with capital ones. About the IP: Please use dnsstuff.com that the IP I used is a very general one. * Thank you.

Decline reason:

This doesn't seem to be a valid reason for unblocking a sockpuppet account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

İlknur, you're missing the point here. Just in case you are in fact an innocent bystander, let me try to explain. The specific reason you have been banned is because it appears extremely likely that you are the same person who previously functioned here under the user name "Justice Forever" — an editor who was indefinitely banned from Wikipedia three years ago for flagrant misbehaviour — and that you are trying to evade this ban by creating a different account and pretending to be someone else (this is called "sockpuppetry" and is forbidden by Wikipedia policy). If you are in fact "Justice Forever", you are well aware of all this, you've tried to do this same thing many times, and shame on you for feigning ignorance. The only way you can get the decision to ban you reversed is to convince people that you are not the same person as the banned user "Justice Forever". Anything else (essentially everything you wrote above in your unblock request) is irrelevant right now. Richwales (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

İlknur sevtapli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• The www.dnsstuff.com check of the IP: 83.66.22.10: Reverse DNS: [No reverse DNS entry per doldns01.dol.com.tr.] Reverse DNS authenticity: [UNKNOWN] ASN Name: DOGAN-ONLINE (TURKEY'S ONE OF THE BIGGEST NEWSPAPER'S NETWORK) Country IP Range: 83.66.0.0 to 83.66.255.255 PRIVATE(INTERNAL) IP? NO IP address registrar: whois.ripe.net KNOWN PROXY? NO * The claimed sockpuppetry of Justice Forever: The (Sockpuppet) usernames of Justice Forever are ALL ENGLISH. My username "İlknur sevtapli" is TURKISH.

Decline reason:

If I ever made a sock, it would be in a different language than usual too - still won't mean it isn't me. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I GAVE UP. Whatever proof I show, I will be BANNED. I understood, because I am tried to be banned via WP:3RR, then Sockpuppetry,... Even if I am unbloked, it is clear to me that somebody will find a reason to block me. OK. That's it. İlknur sevtapli (talk) 09:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

İlknur sevtapli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Looking at the IP invaestigation more carefully above that I presented, an admin can alter the status

Decline reason:

Yes, an admin can alter your status. You are currently blocked for abusing multiple accounts, so any request for a change in that status needs to include an explanation of why we should change it. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

İlknur sevtapli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Beeblebrox's Points: * An admin can alter the status. * Currently blockage for abusing multiple accounts: THIS CLAIM IS DUE TO THE USAGE OF THE SAME IP. * Any request for a change in the status needs to include an explanation of why admins should change it: 1. USAGE OF SAME IP 2. My username "İlknur sevtapli" is TURKISH, whereas the claimed sockpuppetry's all usernames are English!. * Beeblebrox, I have already made the explanation why admins should change the status in my above unblock requests.

Decline reason:

Restating the same reasons that have been declined in the past is an abuse of the unblock request process. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I have locked it for a week. You can either use the time to put together an actual new request, or contact the unblock mailing list. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)