January 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Red supergiant, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sinclairian (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red supergiant. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sinclairian (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at YouTube Kids, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sinclairian (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: V1216 Belgium (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBritinator (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Οοβεττττμεντττσααβ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:V1216 Belgium

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:V1216 Belgium, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply