Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Анна Озерова! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer 14:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank You Very Much

I have the Vepsian Kalitkad.

A page you started (Ani Hoang) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Ani Hoang, Анна Озерова!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:


Thanks for writing and uploading this article. I cannot understand: "Four years participated in Кой е по-по-най, who hosted by Katsi Vaptsarov." Apart from that it reads well.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fiki (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lately. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I edited page about Fiki (singer), that tell true stories of pop-folk singers from Bulgaria and I written about his debut unknown album, which will release coming soon. And I edited about model of Hungarian descent Erika Gerceg. Thanks, Анна Озерова (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of tenors in non-classical music, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 02:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nikolai Noskov

edit

Hello. I can't find where is the article on proposed for deletion page and what is the reason. You must bring some arguments, is not working if you only delete the "deletion box" from the page. (Rhinen)

August 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Noskov without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 10:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Don't delete, I want full protection of this page! --Анна Озерова (talk) 10:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Nikolai Noskov. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. The Banner talk 10:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Banner stop take this template in other pages! I want, that the world will know not only like soloist of Gorky Park, but and solo singer! I want the protection of this page! --Анна Озерова (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Noskov, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 10:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Nikolai Noskov. The Banner talk 11:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 11:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Don't play with rules! --Анна Озерова (talk) 11:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Анна Озерова. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ani Hoang

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ani Hoang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. St0n3 BG (talk) 00:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ani Hoang for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ani Hoang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ani Hoang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. St0n3 BG (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply