Honours

edit

You are creating redirects while changing the links and the honours for the Olympics should go to the german olympic team article. Kante4 (talk) 14:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC) ۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Dear, the honors of the German national team and the German Olympic team (East and West) should be mentioned in a column. These are the principles of work. Other articles also state this. ۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, those should be noted in their respective article(s). Kante4 (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Yes your vote is absolutely right. But it should also be mentioned in this article. If you let me, I'll make these changes. ۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC) ۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC) If you let me, I'll make these changes. ۳۷ جام با تاج کبیر آسیا (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

No, they should not be there. The olympic article is perfect for that. Kante4 (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lyrische (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Lyrische: The article has no deletion criteria and can remain. ✓Aali.JenabTalk 13:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Al Hilal F.C.–Esteghlal F.C. rivalry. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@CAPTAIN RAJU: The article has no deletion criteria and can remain. ✓Aali.JenabTalk 13:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AaliJenab (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why did you block me !? Tagging (delete tag) that article was wrong. I changed it. I did not do anything wrong that you blocked me. ✓Aali.JenabTalk 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: Why did you block me !? Tagging (delete tag) that article was wrong. I changed it. I did not do anything wrong that you blocked me.
@Bbb23: Why did you block me !? Tagging (delete tag) that article was wrong. I changed it. I did not do anything wrong that you blocked me. ✓Aali.JenabTalk 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jpgordon: I am still not convinced. I was blocked for no reason! ✓Aali.JenabTalk 16:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
You were warned repeatedly to stop removing that template. You were told you would be blocked. You continued doing it. You were blocked. What did you expect would happen? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jpgordon: You are right. I did not notice the hints. At least open me to write my opinion about deleting the article and comment on the delete page. ✓Aali.JenabTalk 18:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit (blether) 15:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Esteghlal F.C. official honors

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Template:Esteghlal F.C. official honors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not functional and we don't have similar templates for other clubs!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Miha2020 (talk) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Esteghlal F.C. official honors

edit

 Template:Esteghlal F.C. official honors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Miha2020 (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply