折毛

AfC notification: Draft:Siege of Borovsk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Siege of Borovsk. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi 折毛! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to improve Draft:Siege of Borovsk, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Borovsk (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TTP1233 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Borovsk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Siege of Borovsk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jyoti Roy (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 折毛! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jyoti Roy (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is An urgent report about a 折毛 (talk • contribs • logs • filter log • block log)'s hoaxes. Thank you. PAVLOV (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Borovsk

The article Siege of Borovsk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article of hoax. This user was also found creating plenty of hoaxes in Chinese Wikipedia and caused serious damage to the reputation of the Chinese Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. だ☆ぜ (Dasze) 15:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbcom notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#User:折毛's cross-wiki hoaxes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, PAVLOV (talk) 09:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Thanks, PAVLOV (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

回复

请到这里回复，谢谢。--GZWDer (talk) 04:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

面对一整版嘲讽，实在无颜面对--折毛 (talk) 06:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

請問您為何要創立卡申銀礦等不存在的事物、人物、戰役條目，創作詳細細節，並羅列明顯與主題無關之文獻、不存在的書籍、超過書籍頁數的頁碼為註腳？--Wikimycota（talk） 06:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

靖君，啊，你也是我辜负信任最多的人，对不起。很难说动机，也许是个人感情问题，一写写了很多，浪费了很多时间，只是为了宣泄一下内心。有些时候精神状态不稳人会做傻事，我是带点强迫症来写这些条目的，有些时候写得太过火了甚至到了清晨才睡--折毛 (talk) 06:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

靖君您给我那个俄罗斯星章时，我还是循规蹈矩的，而且我那时候真有心去写好一些基础条目，所以拒绝了你的特别贡献的提案，因为我自知不配那个贡献，我本来是打算写好基础条目，是后来走了歪路，去写些没有人关心的事。--折毛 (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

说实话，您这个真不是没有才能，相反比起大多数架空历史创作者来说您的才能无与伦比(这不是讽刺)。如果将这番才能用在合适的地方，比如自行创作架空历史文学，或者替战锤等拥有架空罗斯设定的世界观产品编写历史，何愁无法解决经济问题... 110.23.93.240 (talk) 08:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC) Jonathan5566 likes this.

何必在维基百科做这些无聊事…您在写作方面有所擅长，也可以写点自媒体文章赚点钱…总之，祝您生活顺利 103.173.255.162 (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

谢谢，这事快把我逼疯了，也许真的需要一走了之，彻底不看--折毛 (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

“编著”您真的是大陆人吗？或者现在这个号是菜鸟控制帮忙写的，折毛本人已经跑路了？ 103.173.255.162 (talk) 12:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

著、着我是混用的有维基人帮忙解释了，并给出了我和约翰阁下的交谈，纠结我是不是中国人这个真没意义，我是中国人，不是台湾人。--折毛 (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

对于我这个半吊子维基人来说，了解了您的事迹之后真的让我大吃一惊同时也无法理解。这样的事真的是既损人又不利己，何必呢？希望以后您可以找到让自己快乐同时又比这些事有意义的爱好，祝平安。--SergeantMitchell (talk) 06:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

请求阁下指明一下远东华人强制流配这篇条目（存档在zh:Wikipedia:维基百科恶作剧列表/远东华人强制流配）哪些是真实，哪些是虚构的，因为这篇条目影响范围太广，所有希望阁下帮忙澄清一下。——BlackShadowG (talk) 10:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC) @BlackShadowG:， 首段 指苏联共产党与苏联政府在1937-1938年大清洗期间，对远东的华人进行的强制人口转移及政治迫害，属于历次苏联的人口转移之一。当时联共（布）有计划地强迁大量欧俄移民至远东地区。原文经查无相关记载，请改参阅刘涛，卜君哲 俄罗斯远东开发与华人华侨(1860－1941)。其中远东华人直接因肃反而牵连的人数为？人，多于入籍苏联国籍的中华民国国民。在这些人中，有3,794人在远东地区被苏联当局直接释放，3,922人被直接处决，？人被强制迁移或流放。其余人士则受到不同程度的拘禁或被迫进入古拉格进行劳改。

• 人数成疑，请保持疑问

俄国内战期间的华工 全文真实，请查阅相关论文

新经济政策下的俄华矛盾

• 首段可信
• 1920年代未期至1930年代初至不讲道理，愚蠢 一段自查无结果，请删除
• 封闭性的华人社区至认为华人可能与日本情报机构有勾结存疑，请索阅相关书本
• 1920年代中后期整段可信

中东路事件的中苏冲突

• 1928年12月29日中华民国东北易帜，东北军总司令张学良向国民政府投降。苏联当局对以蒋中正为首之中国国民党势力延伸至中俄边境看法分歧，时任苏联部长会议主席、联共（布）中央书记处第一书记约瑟夫·维萨里奥诺维奇·史达林本人认为，只要南京国民政府不与日本联合反苏，即便前年曾出现国民党清党事件，苏联当局应与国民政府保持一定的良好关系 一段自查无结果，请删除
• 首段其他部份可信
• 次段可信

满洲国成立后强迁远东华人

• 首个文献引用经机翻后可信，阁下可再检查，其他可信

远东大清洗

• 1934年，时任苏联列宁格勒州委书记谢尔盖·米罗诺维奇·基洛夫被列昂尼德·瓦西里耶维奇·尼古拉耶夫枪杀。史达林下令严查，针对反党份子、托洛茨基派份子、反革命份子的调查开始[31]。 1936年8月19日，第一次莫斯科审判开始，联共（布）中央正式开始大清洗运动。 1937年8月1日，在时任内务人民委员部人民委员尼古拉·伊万诺维奇·叶若夫副手米哈伊尔·彼得洛维奇·弗里诺夫斯基的提议下，《内务人民委员部第447号命令》发布，允许内务人员在未经审讯下拘禁或处决反苏反革命份子，以保卫苏维埃政权
• 此处应引用447号命令本身，缺了一个引子
• 该命令涵盖远东地区。当时的远东地区内务委员会主席捷连季·德米特里耶维奇·杰里巴斯捕捉反革命份子。但叶若夫仍将杰里巴斯撤职，命亲信亨里希·萨莫伊洛维奇·柳什科夫接任
• 日数，人数，叶若夫评论均不可考，请删除
• 1937年8月21日至皆被逮捕都可信，叶若夫文件是确实的。

--折毛 (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

內務人民委員部第693號命令 全文可信，唯独华人一词应改为属于华人的哈尔滨俄罗斯族，他们是白军或亲属为主。

1937年

• 1937年12月22日 至 在晚上展开 可信，请参阅尹广明 苏联处置远东华人问题的历史考察(1937—1938)和原始苏联档案。
• 属天主教社群的当地波兰人受创最深，因为他们当时在庆祝圣诞夜，几乎被内务人民委员部一网打尽，全被流放至西伯利亚中部。其次则是朝鲜人，总共七个朝鲜人聚居地的街区全被苏联当局肃清，抵抗者一律杀无赦，对朝鲜人的肃反用了三天两夜才结束。难以查证，请暂且默认不可靠
• 12月27日晚，内务人民委员部再对华人聚居的海参崴第18区，亦即华人称之「百万街」、「百万庄」的聚居区进行肃清至种族灭绝 查无资料，请删除
• 2010年6月8日，以雅罗斯拉夫·利万斯基（Ярослав Ливанский）领导下的的俄罗斯考古学家团队在百万街遗址挖掘时发现了掩埋大量遗骸的地方，其中也发现了华人的遗骸可信，且新闻可佐证，但需要解释什么是街区清洗行动或肃清黑帮行动（зачистке бандитских кварталов）
• 1937年12月29日晚 至段末 可信

1938年

• 1938年1月10日，中华民国驻苏联大使馆 针对华人的大肃反展开可信，引子中有关塔兹族无来源，是当初提到才加上去的，当年我花了几天都找不到，如无法佐证也可去除
• “其剽掠无所不取，酷索钱财，藏匿者以刑相逼，拷毙无算，备极惨毒” 此句查后实为添加， 2月14日，中华民国驻海参崴总领事馆电告外交部苏联抓捕华侨、掠夺及充公苏联华人财产。 去掉形容词
• 《中央日报》需要台湾维基人索引检查，我已失去索取《中央日报》条件。 《工商日报》经香港旧报纸索引工商日报和苏俄、华侨，确有此报道。
• 段落其他部分可信，可以以论文引述作证，苏联档案也有给出雅科夫列夫基金会的数据库文档。

统计

远东本地释放可信，可对比数据

由于华侨进入新疆需要中华民国使领机构的签证，根据中华民国驻海参崴、伯力、海兰泡三地领事馆上报的1938年移侨新疆签证统计数字，驻海参崴总领事馆为8,025名、驻伯力领事馆为3,004名、驻海兰泡领事馆为2,714名华侨发放入境新疆签证。 可信

由于当时中国东北已为满洲国所据，而外蒙古境内又尚未有铁路连接中俄两国，因此被释俄罗斯华人经西伯利亚铁路向西进发，抵新西伯利亚后转乘南下列车经阿勒泰地区抵达中国新疆省。虽然基本属实，然而没有文献支撑

1938年6月13日至7月8日，7,130名华人在海参崴的艾戈尔舍尔德车站分乘5列火车被强行迁走，前四列列车6,189人（分别为1,379人、1,637人、1,613人和1,560人）遣返新疆，其馀941人坐第五列车北上。可信 尹广明p.51

第二次出发在7月11日至7月14日，共3,341名普通平民先后乘车返回新疆。没有文献支撑，请暂且默认不可靠

第三次出发在10月11日至10月12日，释放罪行较轻的囚犯1,000多人返回新疆。其中滨海州6,189名、乌苏里斯克州1,665名、布拉哥1,815名、伯力推测2000名，可信 尹广明p.51-52

流放至远东以外的苏联领土人数无法证明，请删除数目，并重新统计

依据苏联统计机关的人口普查结果，在1926年至1937年这段时间内，中亚地区华人数量极少，可是在1939年苏联人口普查中该地区突然出现5,500余名华人；这些人显然是从远东、东西伯利亚等地迁移来的，并且应当以远东地区迁来的为多。同时，根据1938年6月3日叶若夫的命令，“持有苏联身份证件的中国丈夫的中国妻子，随其配偶一同迁移到哈萨克斯坦”。1939年9月至12月间，又有227名从监狱中释放的华人被迁往哈萨克斯坦。根据普查结果，中亚华人（主要集中在哈萨克与乌兹别克两地）在1939年初有5,567人。 全段属实，可信，只是没有直接指出流放人数

拘禁、处决和劳改请整段删除 仅在赤塔被捕的俄罗斯华人就有1,500名。其中三分之一以上（568人）在审讯过程中被拷打致死。1938年6月14日柳什科夫逃亡至满洲国，他透露被捕的华人数目达到11,000人 只保留这句

截至1939年1月1日，共有3,179位俄罗斯华人关押在古拉格，当中1,794人为中华民国公民[77]，在1942年1月1日，在古拉格被关押的华人达到5,192人 句子经修改后，可信，有苏联档案证明

华侨被捕后生活是极其悲惨的，既要遭受惨无人道的刑讯，还要面临繁重的劳役生活。苏联当局允许内务部探员根据各自工作需要，无限制的使用暴力和刑讯，且没有作出任何规范。部分华侨在审讯时被迫将身体贴在火炉旁烤，以拷问有关间谍的口供。很多华侨难以忍受各种毒刑，直接在狱中被拷问致死。不少华侨被抓之后即被立刻发往苦寒之地，罚做苦工，从此“灭迹海外，永无生还之望”。其中250位被起诉“非法越境”的华侨，被送到古拉格后分成每十人一组，被迫令搬运共重两吨的原木，当中很少有人能够挺过两个星期。他们来到古拉格后的第三个月，只剩下一人幸存，其馀全数死亡 句子经修改后，可信

后两段不可信，请删除另写，可参考 中国人在海参崴:符拉迪沃斯托克的历史篇章 谢清明. 抗战初期的苏联远东华侨问题（1937-1938） 以及其他有关古拉格的论文和文章，当年这里是没写好，可以推倒再写

后续纪念全段属实，可信

我还是挂念那些死去的同胞，这是我能力范围内能做到的最大考证了，希望同胞们不被历史淡忘。这条目是真的是半吊子水平，过程也很艰辛--折毛 (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

「史达林」––Raccoozzy (talk) 02:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

提问

我希望了解到您在俄维的词条осада Смоленска （1286）的真实性，究竟是您像卡申银矿一样的造假结果还是经过资料查询的结果？ 您所引用的文献只有112页而您引用了第126页。 我在yandex搜索осада Смоленска（1286）也无该年记录。 但是我在查询布良斯克地区旅游网站时其中关于切尔尼戈夫-布良斯克王公奥列格罗曼诺维奇当中提及：在尼康纪事当中有记载1285年罗曼公前往斯摩棱斯克烧毁郊区。而尼康纪事我查找其PDF文件时发现是原手稿的书影，里面的文字以我初学者的水平完全无法阅读。 同时，在1804年出版的истории губернского города смоленска（101页）中也提及 布良斯克王公罗曼格列波维奇（原文如此）想要占领斯摩棱斯克并进攻城市。 虽然是存疑事件但希望得到您的答复，因为我平常查找的切尔尼戈夫公国相关资料居多（比如扎伊采夫的书），所以比较在意这条的真实性。 谢谢。 黑野鸭 (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Great job for creating Rus history! Hengzichao (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Just write a novel

Seriously. I only learned about this from a article. Its funny as hell, never do it again though. Im gonna be honest ive also messed around with wikipedia before but mostly just to put like joke entries in my high schools page, all of which have been removed. You of course went too far but you could probably make things better. But if the article i read is to be believed you seemingly have a natural talent for worldbuilding. Write a historical fiction novel with all the stuff you made up, that has a prelude explaining what lead you to write said novel and agknowledge that it is completley fictional. Maybe add magic or something to make it more interesting. Then once you publish it use the money to help your family and give like a third of your earnings to the Wikimedia foundation. You have so much experience writing for things like this, you could even maybe make it like a novel that poses as an alt history book for russia (But if you did so i would reccomend changing up the names and adding more fantasty elements just to make it clear that nothing in this book is to be believed).

If you ask me doing that and giving the money to wikimedia is your best way to make up for all of this. 140.232.155.249 (talk) 04:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

hope youre doing well

it's been over a year since this happened so youll probably never see this but i hope your family's situation got better and youve found fulfillment with whatever craft or career youve pursued <3

wishing you the best Lism Account (talk) 04:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)