楊千呱
 | This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Welcome 楊千呱!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Hello, 楊千呱, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Chinese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!
您好，楊千呱。歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科。雖然我們隨時歡迎你在英文版維基百科編輯，但是你這次執筆所使用的英文並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準。若是你們不介意的話，你們可以在中文版維基百科編輯。感謝你們參加維基百科。George Ho (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
September 2015
edit
Your recent editing history at Rebel Heart Tour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Widr (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Rebel Heart Tour
edit
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:楊千呱 reported by User:SNUGGUMS (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- There is an open discussion at Talk:Rebel_Heart_Tour#HongKong.2FMacau_vs_China where consensus should first be acieved and then further changes to this issue should be made. You have already crossed 3RR and you are using IPs as socks to continue the change in Born This Way Ball article. Face up and stop this please. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
楊千呱 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am a Hong Konger so I do know where I'm from and my own identity is. I do not need an Indonesian to tell me what my country is because you just know this very superficially. Previous users usually type Hong Kong as countries and this has nothing wrong. Hong Kong is usually classified as country no matter using scales of olympic games, WTO or APEC. No people put San Juan (Puerto Rico)'s country field as USA and Taipei (Taiwan)'s country field as China. If you insist yourself is right, you should change Taipei's country field to China as well. What you are doing is completely non-sense. And you were the one changing the orginality as it put Hong Kong in the country field previously and editors do it that way as always. Do not change the originality which lead to disruptive and false edits! What should I put in the country field before those shows held before the transfer of sovereignty in 1997? United Kingdom? So, change it back to Hong Kong!—User:楊千呱 1:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC+8)
Decline reason:
Regardless of what you think may be true or false, ignoring warnings to stop edit warring will always lead to a block. If you continue to do it after your block expires, your next block will be for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Sorry. I'm not the only one who keeps editing. You should also block him/her as well. Be fair please.—User:楊千呱 1:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC+8)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:楊千呱 reported by User:IndianBio (Result: ). Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gpcv77, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Blocked 2 weeks for resumption of edit-warring
edit {{unblock|reason=I'm not the only one who edits... you should block IndianBio as well as he/she began the edit war first! Please go and track back the history first and DO NOT listen one side THANK YOU!~~~~}}. September 2015
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 04:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC) |