红卫兵

No bogus warnings!

Yes, this means you, Miacek!

Please see here

Regarding your concern about media sources in Demmin suicide, I found two books by Austrian and German modern historians. Both name the reasons as completely different than presented as of now in the article[1] --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 红卫兵. You have new messages at Talk:Mass suicide in Demmin#Sources.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WP:CLEANSTART

Looking at your history I'm fairly convinced that you are an older user returned (or, more accurately, someone who claimed to have left but never did). If this is truly the case, please let me know. You don't even have to disclose who your old account is. My concern is that switching identities can be seen as an attempt to avoid scrutiny. For editors who want to have a "clean start", it is strongly advised that they edit in topic areas different than their old account, and if they continue their old ways that it is likely that their identity will be discovered.

If you claim that you haven't edited recently (in the past month) as another editor, I'm afraid I'll have to take the matter to sockpuppet investigations to clear this up. I've double-checked our policy for editors who want to start over from scratch, and for the most part you've been compliant, so if you admit that you've done this I won't pursue it or try to reveal your identity. I will note that there is an editing overlap between accounts which isn't in total compliance of our policy. -- Atama頭 20:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Now what exactly have I done wrong? I am told to register [2], I did. It seemed a good idea at the time, especially since Miacek was going around making false claims as to my motives [3]. Once I registered, he storms out and bangs the door [4]. Now what?

Miacek entered false information in the Erika Steinbach article [5], which I corrected, giving a reference. NB the de.wiki article was blocked at the time as the topic was very hot then. Three days later he tags some template with a less than helpful edit summary. Since I remember quite clearly that we got a lot of flak when we bombed Podgorica, I felt free to remove the tag with a comment to that effect. I am not aware of any other incidents which could give the impression that I am "doing [my] best to disrupt all of [his] contributions, no matter how small".

Since all I get from this user is abuse, I asked for advice. Which is commented at length by Miacek [6], with more abuse directed at me and admins in general.

And now you obviously decided that I am the problem here. Why? Did I attack him personally? Did I follow his edits around? Did I enter discussions to inhibit his work? Where do I aim to create irritation, annoyance or distress?

As I see it, Miacek has a problem with ME, which makes it my problem. And I still have no idea what to do about it. So, I am not sure that going after sock puppets will help much. --红卫兵 (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dodo19 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Atama頭 16:56, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maicek for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 10:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/92.225.140.61 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 17:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)