*Ulla*
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, *Ulla*, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hiding talk 13:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
merge
editSorry, I just haven't been on Wiki for a long time. I cant marge the two articles because I am banned from Wiki, my little brother caught some swear words on it, so, can you please do it? Thank you. Weirdy 06:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC).
- No, I will not. The thing is, most people think they should not be merged. Anyway, sorry for you that you have been banned. -*Ulla* 21:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine. No-one's objected to it and - as I said on the discovery page - it seems a reasonable stub type to have. The only problem was the category name, and that's been fixed. Go for it :) Grutness...wha? 00:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Naming policy
editWelcome to Wikipedia. You are attempting to decide idiomatic usage in a language in which you do not claim fluency; English does not do what you insist it should. I have commented on this at some length. Please do not.
Have you even read our naming policies, WP:NAME, Wikipedia:Use English, and WP:NCGN? We are agreed (except as here where someone's ox is gored) to do what English does; it is not consistent, and we should not be. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nice sarcasm. I do apologize for concluding from the length of this page that you were a newbie. But your opinion remains unbased in Wikipedia policy and the English language. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 13:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Request signature
editHi, could you remove the image from your signature. See WP:SIG#Images for all the reasons against it. Garion96 (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD for Lundby
editA user started an AfD for Lundby (dollhouses). You might want to comment to defend yourself, as you've been accused of spamming. (Which I personally find preposterous.) Smashville 14:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- HI. Thanks for giving me this notice. It seems I didn't have to comment, because the page has been kept anyway. I don't log in to English Wikipedia that often... -Ulla — 13:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Talk:Sauber
editWhat skin and screen resolution are you using? Using Monobook and a screen resolution of 1024x768, I can see the index quite easily when I open the page (because the WikiProject banners are collapsed). I think you'll find about 90% of all Wikipedia talk pages are arranged like this (admittedly they don't all have talk page headers). But if you decide to change it again, I won't change it back. DH85868993 (talk) 09:53, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!
edit
HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Block
editSince you're already blocked on svwp I don't really see the point but rules are rules. I've asked for a block on your account here on enwp as well as the one already in place on svwp. GameOn (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
edit| 75px | Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
- Checkuser at Swedish Wikipedia has confirmed that you are violating sock puppetry policy, very probably as a subaccount of User:E.G.. Based on this and verification that your accounts have been used to violate multiple account practices on English Wikipedia, this account has been indefinitely blocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Media about telephones
editCategory:Media about telephones, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 03:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Moominvalley for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moominvalley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.