March 2020

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent you from evading blocks.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui  09:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.39.224.8 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why you are blocking me, GSS has scammed me, he is not editing the Jessie Joe Jacobs page. He has confirmed that this from his account on Freelancer.com. He first told me and then removed from See also on Nikhil Chinapa (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikhil_Chinapa&oldid=945794929). He said that he will make edits from a new account and if anything happens, he will using this account to intervene. Then I have transferred the money, if you want I can share the screenshot of Paypal transfer. But once I have made the transfer he is not replying me. If you want I can reach out to Jimmy Wales on his twitter account directly (https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales). You are indirectly supporting his scam. One more thing he has also said that he can delete and remove content from Jacobs's political opponent also and could use paid tag. I have all emails for your proof. 1.39.224.8 (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yunshui Okay, I am reaching out to Jimmy Wales on Twitter then. 1.39.224.8 (talk) 09:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply