101.175.134.41

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Israel at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex Cohn (talk) 05:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Drowned World/Substitute for Love, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: What have I been doing lately? I'm confused. 101.175.134.41 (talk) 07:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Adding good article and page protect status to Drowned World/Substitute for Love which does have any of those. Jim1138 (talk) 07:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: See revision number 761922332. It is a good article. But are you saying that adding a padlock to the top bar of the article does not protect the page? If I create an account and become an admin how do I protect a page? 101.175.134.41 (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

The GA was added by the previous edit to yours (i.e. disruptive editing) not by consensus of the community. See wp:Good article for how to get a page nominated. Just adding the padlock does not protect the page. Yes, if you become an admin, you can protect a page. I would encourage you to become an admin. You wouldn't want me as one. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Why wouldn't I want you as an admin? Admins are amazing! 101.175.134.41 (talk) 07:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Short attention span. ;o) Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:L3X1. Jim1138 (talk) 08:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 08:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Banned

I Have Been Blocked By User:Widr, And I Don't Wanna Be Blocked! :(

This Isn't Even Very Good! :(

I Need To Have A Good Reason! :(

I Want To Be Here To Build An Encyclopedia... :(

I Don't Really Wanna Let Anyone To Block Me! >:(

Hello! Hello, admins! Please unblock me! I did not receive any warning, notification or opportunity to discuss Jim1138's concern prior to my banning and I am not a vandal. Jim1138 does not allow users to e-mail him and I cannot post on Jim1138's user talk page or any admin page to discuss this! 101.175.134.41 (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Still Banned

I haven't heard anything about why I was banned, how long I will be banned or whether there has been any review progress. 101.175.134.41 (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Please take a look at Guide to appealing blocks, then add the following to the bottom of this page, substituting "your reason here" for why you should not be blocked anymore: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} --Alex Cohn (talk) 21:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Getting Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

101.175.134.41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry! :( 101.175.134.41 (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Getting Unblocked Attempt 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

101.175.134.41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry Optimist on the run! :( Im Going To Make Some Helpful Contributions! :) 101.175.134.41 (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I suggest you wait out your block. PhilKnight (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purpose of Wikipedia

You might want to read what the purpose of Wikipedia is: Wikipedia:Purpose. If you wish to make a contribution following these principals, please join us. Otherwise, it might be best if you look elsewhere. You might find this of interest as well: Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

---