Wikipedia is a reference work and a tertiary source that, like the Encyclopaedia Brittanica, makes no claims of being the sort of source suitable for academic writing. On the other hand, millions of Wikipedia articles have carefully curated "Reference" sections that can assist researchers with their studies. As for our "agenda-driven biased rag", your rhetoric sheds light on your own glaring bias. Wikipedia has been a top ten website worldwide for many years, and we have billions of monthly pageviews. Here is a friendly suggestion: If you despise the vastly wide range of information that Wikipedia provides, simply stop reading this website, leaving bandwidth for people with open minds. Cullen328 (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply