108.77.202.140

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electrical injury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Your source said absolutely nothing about the UN calling out the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center for torture Meters (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• User:Meters: Please do not accuse me of vandalism. If you read the article, the center has been condemned by the United Nations for torture, and the FDA has declared that the use of electric shocks is not medical treatment. I would therefore like you to reinstate the edit. --108.77.202.140 (talk) 02:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

My apologies. That was supposed to be an unsourced edit warning, not a vandalism warning, which is why my comment was about the sourcing. And, as a I said, the source you used "said absolutely nothing about the UN calling out the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center for torture". You cannot make claims such as that without reliable sources. And using a source which does not even mention the UN or use the word torture (the eye-catching headline asks if it is torture, and would not even have been written by the story's author) makes it difficult to believe this was a good faith edit. Meters (talk) 03:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Meters: I have returned the information with appropriate sourcing. I understand that you are just trying to do your job, but please do not accuse me of bad faith either. --108.77.202.140 (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

---