October 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Boy Scouts of America membership controversies was changed by 112.205.7.91 (u) (t) deleting 10308 characters on 2010-10-25T01:29:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 01:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elockid (Talk) 01:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 01:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Notice
edit | The article Éamon de Valera, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:
|
--Domer48'fenian' 15:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Éamon de Valera. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
December 2010
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 13:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
February 2011
edit Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Impalement, you may be blocked from editing. There's too much vandalism going on from this IP Trigaranus (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Castellan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yopie (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HalfShadow 17:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |