October 2008

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-Christian violence in India, you will be blocked from editing. -- Tinu Cherian - 03:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry, did not know that the money-seeking Missionary mafia is still active here.

  Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Tinu Cherian - 03:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Anti-Christian violence in India, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Tinu Cherian - 03:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


There is a Christian missionary proselytisation gang up here.

edit

The more anti-India articles that get projected abroad, the more the donations these guys in India get from Europe and America. WP is being misused for anti-Indian propaganda to make money. This matter should be investigated by well- meaning Admins. As it is, the anti- India and pro-proselytisation commercial interests in WP are a matter of much discussion in pro-Indian sites. The activities of the few POV editors and mercenary Admins like AKradick who seem to have some vested interest in the matter are creating a bad reputation to WP. The matter should be investigated in good faith.

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
116.68.96.215 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
116.68.96.215 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts


Decline reason: But you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia because you were editing disruptively, so you aren't allowed to edit any longer. You'll need to trust other users to work toward the most neutral possible encyclopedia, because your time at Wikipedia is over. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Evidence of commercial operations in WP

edit

Akradick's blocking and Fisher queenies' Decline to unblock - is repeated here every time. The commercial co-operation by these IDs and editors like tinucherian, googlean, recoedfree,Vvarkey [all low-caste converts looking for money] etc needs investigation by independent Admins. 116.68.96.215 (talk) 16:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Er, I'd never heard of you before you requested unblock. I reviewed your contributions to see if you'd been editing disruptively. I've never been to India and don't care very much about it. It would be hard to find someone more independent than that. Also, I've never posted here before. You're probably thinking of your original account; this is the one you were using to try to avoid your block; the rules don't permit you to do that. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kendriya Vidyalaya, Kanjikode, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.