November 2006

edit

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Intensity (physics). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Srleffler 01:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Western canon

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Western canon, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Fayenatic london (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cuisine of Africa. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Pyrospirit Shiny! 01:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Farrakhan, you will be blocked from editing. Yahel Guhan 00:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Marriage Act 1753 has been reverted. Please do not remove content from pages without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 00:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2009

edit
 

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Parallax worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 19:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to New Deal, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page New Deal. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wabbaseka, Arkansas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:22, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reliability of Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. E♴ (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Sfgiants1995. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Higher Education Act of 1965, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Sfgiants1995 (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raphael Gentry: A Man of Great Faith and Empowerment (October 18)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! 12.13.176.132, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

September 2015

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page George Campbell Jr. has been reverted.
Your edit here to George Campbell Jr. was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ojh0GxlUY1U) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.