November 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Best of George Harrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 09:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Best of George Harrison, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I did cite a source https://www.facebook.com/fabfourfaq2 which the Fab Four Faq 2.0 Group. They are very knowledgeable about these albums and posts. You were the one who removed the source which I cited. If you wish to re add that which you removed you can also re add the source in the proper manner of which to be cited. 12.172.228.128 (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
You did not cite the source in the article, and it doesn't matter anyway because a random Facebook group is not considered a reliable source. They are a kind of self-published source, which are not appropriate to cite on Wikipedia. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 16:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is not a random facebook group. This is a Beatles facebook group which pulls from reliable sources such as published books by authors who are authoritians on The Beatles. If you visited the group yourself you would see that instead of just judging without looking into it. 12.172.228.128 (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you genuinely believe this source is reliable even though Wikipedia does not consider it so then I would suggest making your case on the talk page of the article. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have created a section at the talk page of the article. Please make your case for inclusion there instead of continuing to revert. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Facebook is not considered a reliable source and you're going to have a very difficult time basing that change on something from a Facebook group. It will almost certainly be removed again and if you continue to add it, you will probably end up blocked for edit warring or adding poorly sourced material. Please read the links on referencing that have been shared and please stop edit warring to make a change that multiple people have already undone. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply