June 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Overarm bowling with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Overarm bowling with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 (talk) 22:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Criminal tattoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

December 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Criminal tattoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Mifter (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced or inadequately referenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles. Thank you.   Will Beback  talk  23:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prison tattooing, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Daonguyen95. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Teardrop tattoo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Daonguyen95 (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Plague doctor costume, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teardrop tattoo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You have been reverted several times by more than one editor. While Wikipedia encourages bold editing, when you are reverted, please discuss the issue, per WP:BRD. Your edit is not merely moving information within the article, you have removed some sourced information without explaining why. SummerPhDv2.0 02:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history at Teardrop tattoo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SummerPhDv2.0 02:55, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Teardrop tattoo references

edit

Yes, that article seems fine as a reference. I've left some comments at Talk:Teardrop tattoo about why we shouldn't say "this source says the person has a tattoo, this other source says they spent time in prison", though. --McGeddon (talk) 09:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, 122.148.82.40. You have new messages at Paul2520's talk page.
Message added 18:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

paul2520 (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  This is the only warning you will receive for using inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language. Using this kind of content outside of a purely encyclopedic context is considered vandalism. Please review this policy before posting again. If you use inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language on Wikipedia in violation of this policy again, as you did to Talk:Arab Jews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

@Paul2520:

Hello,

I have received a message "You have new messages at Paul2520's talk page." dated March 3 2018. (9 months ago).

I haved looked at your page and cannot find where the message is.

I notice there is a warning here about using racist language.

Recently, I did leave a message requesting that the star of David be removed from the Arab Jews page and it not be conflated with Judaism.

I have jewish ancestry but not from Israel; Israel does not represent me nor many non-israeli jews.

Regards.

January 2019

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Teardrop tattoo , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply