Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 United City F.C. season (March 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 122.54.93.91! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Broken Marriage Vow, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Viral Scandal, you may be blocked from editing. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 11:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Again, all Philippine TV series or Movie-related articles can have the year in the lead. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Removal of the "year" in the lead of a article

edit

Hello, I just want to let you know that your edit in the article The Broken Marriage Vow was partially reverted because you've removed the year in the lead. Most Philippine television articles have the year (stating when it first aired) in the lead and it's not necessary to remove it. I've mentioned in my edit summary that this should be discussed properly in the talkpage of the article so there won't be any edit warring. Thanks! VictorTorres2002 (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Jabidah massacre, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Broken Marriage Vow, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Goodvibes500. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lunch Out Loud without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Goodvibes500 (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.