User talk:1234r00t/Archive 9
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Your forgot to sign. Allmightyduck What did I do wrong? 03:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- That was a rather n00bish mistake on my part. Thanks for the heads up. I've corrected it. Mr. R00t Talk 03:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
MOTD changes
- This is a last call. Any opinions should be suggested by and including November 5th. See Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2#Suggested Changes Simply south (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Ah, thanks. I've been busy lately and have not been around. Mr. R00t Talk 02:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
Reporting IP vandals
I think the majority of this person's contributions aren't constructive, so is there a place I should report this person, like a noticeboard? Seems he's been making edits for a while but no one has done anything about it. Devourer09 (t·c) 16:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, a quick look at their contributions show that they haven't been active lately. That means that if they continue they should be reported to WP:AIV as a vandalism only account. But not yet. Mr. R00t Talk 03:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, true. Alright, I'll keep that page in mind. Devourer09 (t·c) 18:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Connie Smith/GA1
Finished looking through the sources yet? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 13:57, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry. I've been extremely busy of late. I'll get on that immediately. Mr. R00t Talk 00:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
thank you!
thank you so much for your help!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meghan solo (talk • contribs) 18:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Earth-Moon.tiff
Thanks for uploading File:Earth-Moon.tiff. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Re: Stephen Colbert
Sure thing, I've only made around ~10 edits. I'll do some work on it right now. It's up to you :) Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 1:52pm • 02:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hi r00t, I fixed the unsourced statements before you completed your review. I'll get on to fixing some of the MOSNUM issues. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:32pm • 05:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Followup on your reply to my help request a few minutes ago
Hi, I wanted to report what I consider a malicious edit to a biography. The other editor posted information about political donations made by the biography subject. The information was quoted from a listing of political contributions by journalists. I reverted the edit within the last hour. I would like to complain to Wikipedia authorities about this editor. How do I go about it? Thank you. Hurmata (talk) 04:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Which editor was it? I can deal with it from there or you could go to WP:ANI and report him. Mr. R00t Talk 04:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- The article is Manohla Dargis and the editor is User:Drrll. Let me ask how things stand at this point: would you consider that such an edit—as I describe it—is bad naughty on its face, or would you have do give it some research and pondering first? Thanks. Hurmata (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Everyone with any interest for their head (used figuratively) does their research before taking actions on Wikipedia. I'll go look around and talk to them. Mr. R00t Talk 05:09, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- The article is Manohla Dargis and the editor is User:Drrll. Let me ask how things stand at this point: would you consider that such an edit—as I describe it—is bad naughty on its face, or would you have do give it some research and pondering first? Thanks. Hurmata (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!
We have reached the midway point in our backlog elimination drive, so here is an update. Participation report — The November drive has 53 participants at this point. We had 77 participants in the September drive. In July, 95 people signed up for the drive, and in May we had 36. If you are not participating, it is not too late to join! Progress report — The drive is quite successful so far, as we have already almost reached our target of a 10% reduction in the number of articles in the backlog. We are doing very well at keeping our Requests page clear, as those articles count double for word count for this drive. Please keep in mind the possibility of removing other tags when you are finished with an article. If the article no longer needs {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, or other similar maintenance tags, please remove them, as this will make the tasks of other WikiProjects easier to complete. Thanks very much for participating in the Drive, and see you at the finish line!
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC).
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
ACC
Nudge nudge - still working this one? 7 02:26, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, apologies. I had to leave for a while. I probably should have broken the reservation. I'll go take a look and create. Mr. R00t Talk 03:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- And this. You've been leaving a lot of open requests without breaking them when you leave. You need to stop reserving them if you can't review them in a timely manner. There is also a message waiting for you on the mailing list regarding User talk:Snooxy, and now I am wondering why you left them a welcome about promotional edits when they have, well, NO edits. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- All right, I won't leave them open for a while. Though as it happens I only left Snooxy open for about 2.5 hours. I've responded to the template issue on your talkpage. Mr. R00t Talk 01:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- And this. You've been leaving a lot of open requests without breaking them when you leave. You need to stop reserving them if you can't review them in a timely manner. There is also a message waiting for you on the mailing list regarding User talk:Snooxy, and now I am wondering why you left them a welcome about promotional edits when they have, well, NO edits. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Why did you take away all my changes to the Valemount page? They were all valid! Could you please re-instate them or tell me why you think it's vandalism? I just wasted a lot of time updating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RockyGoat (talk • contribs) 22:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the only one I saw was the addition of the link which wasn't really appropriate. Mr. R00t Talk 23:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm trying to add an article that links Warfighting with the Marine Corps doctrinal publication by the same title. This book is arguably the foundational doctrine of the Marine Corps. I attempted to delink Warfighting from Soldier for the purpose stated above but noticed that you changed it back. I'm a first time wikipedia user and would love to contribute. I look forward to your response.Joeladrian (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, all I saw was your removal of the redirect. If you wish to write an article go ahead and write it there. Mr. R00t Talk 23:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
per your request
CheckUser is not magic pixie dust :-)
Mlpearc powwow 02:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- That may be why I posted that link to IRC. I was joking obviously. The joke cannot be posted here as it would entail breaking freenode policy and would make me get in trouble. Mr. R00t Talk 02:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
this is CuriousforCanada
Hey! Sorry about all the edits to Sonia Sunger's page, I kept getting copyright notices so I re-wrote the text so it's not duplicated. Although I wrote the original text as well.
Sonia's my wife, and I've taken her photos as well with my Canon 7D camera... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Curiousforcanada (talk • contribs) 00:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- If you'd like to verify (this isn't an option, you really should) that you are Sonia Sunger's wife you should email OTRS (at [email protected]). They'll be able to deal with this better. Mr. R00t Talk 00:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Help with A7 Please!
1234r00t,
I appreciate your willingness to help. I created a page Textbookstop and it was speedily deleted due to A7. I would sincerely appreciate some help!
Thanks!
Dblaser (talk) 17:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Dblaser. I would suggest that you ask Versageek, the admin who deleted it, to move the article to your user space (somewhere like User:Dblaser/Textbookstop where you can add sources and improve it. Mr R00t Talk 'tribs 22:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Dblaser (talk) 00:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
GOCE elections
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!
We have reached the end of our fourth backlog elimination drive. Thanks to all who participated. Stats
Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the September 2010 backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering these barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Our next drive is scheduled for January 2011. In the meantime, please consider helping out at the Wikification drive or any of the other places where help with backlogs is needed. Thank you for participating in the last 2010 backlog elimination drive! We look forward to seeing you in January! Your drive coordinators –The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC).